Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar:142:76-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

Verbal declarative memory impairments in specific language impairment are related to working memory deficits

Jarrad A G Lum  1 , Michael T Ullman  2 , Gina Conti-Ramsden  3
Affiliations

Verbal declarative memory impairments in specific language impairment are related to working memory deficits

Jarrad A G Lum et al. Brain Lang. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

This study examined verbal declarative memory functioning in SLI and its relationship to working memory. Encoding, recall, and recognition of verbal information was examined in children with SLI who had below average working memory (SLILow WM), children with SLI who had average working memory (SLIAvg. WM) and, a group of non-language impaired children with average working memory (TDAvg. WM). The SLILow WM group was significantly worse than both the SLIAvg. WM and TDAvg. WM groups at encoding verbal information and at retrieving verbal information following a delay. In contrast, the SLIAvg. WM group showed no verbal declarative memory deficits. The study demonstrates that verbal declarative memory deficits in SLI only occur when verbal working memory is impaired. Thus SLI declarative memory is largely intact and deficits are likely to be related to working memory impairments.

Keywords: Declarative memory; List learning; Memory; Specific language impairment; Verbal learning; Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean number of words recalled during the encoding phase presented by group. The maximum number of words that could be recalled on a single trial is 14. Error bars show standard error.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportions of recalled during the immediate and delayed recall condition reported by group. Panel A showed unadjusted recall scores. Panel B shows adjusted recall scores. Error bars show standard error.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean d-prime values for delayed recognition reported by group. Panel A shows unadjusted d-prime values. Panel B shows adjusted d-prime values. Error bars show standard error.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alloway T.P., Rajendran G., Archibald L. Working memory in children with developmental disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2009;42:372–382. - PubMed
    1. Alvarez P., Squire L.R. Memory consolidation and the medial temporal lobe: A simple network model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1994;91:7041–7045. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . American Psychiatric Association; Washington, DC: 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V.
    1. Baddeley A. Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2003;4:829–839. - PubMed
    1. Badre D., Poldrack R.A., Paré-Blagoev E.J., Insler R.Z., Wagner A.D. Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 2005;47:907–918. - PubMed

Publication types