Effectiveness of practices for improving the diagnostic accuracy of Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices™ systematic review
- PMID: 25661303
- PMCID: PMC5033652
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.01.014
Effectiveness of practices for improving the diagnostic accuracy of Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices™ systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: This article is a systematic review of the effectiveness of four practices (assay selection, decision point cardiac troponin (cTn) threshold selection, serial testing, and point of care testing) for improving the diagnostic accuracy Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) in the Emergency Department.
Design and methods: The CDC-funded Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) Initiative systematic review method for quality improvement practices was used.
Results: The current ACC/AHA guidelines recommend using cardiac troponin assays with a 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) diagnostic threshold to diagnose NSTEMI. The evidence in this systematic review indicates that contemporary sensitive cTn assays meet the assay profile requirements (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV) to more accurately diagnose NSTEMI than alternate tests. Additional biomarkers did not increase diagnostic effectiveness of cTn assays. Sensitivity, specificity, and NPV were consistently high and low PPV improved with serial sampling. Evidence for use of point of care cTn testing was insufficient to make recommendation, though some evidence suggests that use may result in reduction to patient length of stay and costs.
Conclusions: Based on the review of and the LMBP(TM) A-6 Method criteria, we recommend the use of cardiac troponin assays without additional biomarkers using the 99th percentile URL as the clinical diagnostic threshold for the diagnosis of NSTEMI. We recommend serial sampling with one sample at presentation and at least one additional second sample taken at least 6h later to identify a rise or fall in the troponin level. No recommendation is made either for or against the use of point of care tests.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR).
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Cardiac troponin; Myocardial infarction; Non-ST-segment elevation.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
High-sensitivity troponin assays for the early rule-out or diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jun;19(44):1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta19440. Health Technol Assess. 2015. PMID: 26118801 Free PMC article.
-
Copeptin with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin to rule out non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction early on: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Biochem. 2023 Feb;112:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Nov 23. Clin Biochem. 2023. PMID: 36435204
-
Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of diagnostic strategies for suspected acute coronary syndrome.Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(1):v-vi, 1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta17010. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23331845 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of combined cardiac troponin and copeptin assessment for early rule-out of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Mar;3(1):18-27. doi: 10.1177/2048872613514015. Epub 2013 Nov 20. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014. PMID: 24562800 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of Sex-specific High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I and T Thresholds.Clin Ther. 2024 Dec;46(12):988-994. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.025. Epub 2024 Nov 5. Clin Ther. 2024. PMID: 39505672
Cited by
-
Can we rely on out-of-hospital blood samples? A prospective interventional study on the pre-analytical stability of blood samples under prehospital emergency medicine conditions.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Mar 4;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0371-3. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28259184 Free PMC article.
-
Quality analysis of the clinical laboratory literature and its effectiveness on clinical quality improvement: a systematic review.J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2023 Sep;73(2):108-115. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.23-22. Epub 2023 Jul 7. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37700849 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Laboratory Test-Based Clinical Decision Support Tools on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review.J Appl Lab Med. 2019 May;3(6):1035-1048. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.028019. Epub 2019 Mar 11. J Appl Lab Med. 2019. PMID: 31639695 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 22;6(9):e005852. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005852. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28939707 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Clinical Microbiology Practice Guidelines: American Society for Microbiology Ad Hoc Committee on Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines Assessment.J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Nov;55(11):3183-3193. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01124-17. Epub 2017 Aug 23. J Clin Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28835476 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, the writing group on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1581–98. - PubMed
-
- Sandoval Y, Smith SW, Apple FS. Supply/demand type 2 myocardial infarction: should we be paying more attention? J Amer Coll Card. 2014;63:2079–87. - PubMed
-
- Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE, Jr, Ganiats TG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 doi: 10.1016/.jacc.2014.09.017. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Jesse RL, Newby LK, Ravkilde J, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation. 2007;115:e356–e375. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical