Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;7(7):727-735.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

Cognitive and Physical Demands of Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults: Validation of Expert Panel Ratings

Successful Aging after Elective Surgery Functional Measures Working Group; Tamara G Fong  1 , Lauren J Gleason  2 , Bonnie Wong  1 , Daniel Habtemariam  3 , Richard N Jones  3 , Eva M Schmitt  3 , Sophia E de Rooij  4 , Jane S Saczynski  5 , Alden L Gross  3 , Jonathan F Bean  6 , Cynthia J Brown  7 , Donna M Fick  8 , Ann L Gruber-Baldini  9 , Margaret O'Connor  10 , Patrica A Tabloski  11 , Edward R Marcantonio  12 , Sharon K Inouye  2
Affiliations

Cognitive and Physical Demands of Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults: Validation of Expert Panel Ratings

Successful Aging after Elective Surgery Functional Measures Working Group et al. PM R. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Difficulties with performance of functional activities may result from cognitive and/or physical impairments. To date, there has not been a clear delineation of the physical and cognitive demands of activities of daily living.

Objectives: To quantify the relative physical and cognitive demands required to complete typical functional activities in older adults.

Design: Expert panel survey.

Setting: Web-based platform.

Participants: Eleven experts from 8 academic medical centers and 300 community-dwelling elderly adults age 70 and older scheduled for elective noncardiac surgery from 2 academic medical centers.

Methods: Sum scores of expert ratings were calculated and then validated against objective data collected from a prospective longitudinal study.

Main outcome measurements: Correlation between expert ratings and objective neuropsychologic tests (memory, language, complex attention) and physical measures (gait speed and grip strength) for performance-based tasks.

Results: Managing money, self-administering medications, using the telephone, and preparing meals were rated as requiring significantly more cognitive demand, whereas walking and transferring, moderately strenuous activities, and climbing stairs were assessed as more physically demanding. Largely cognitive activities correlated with objective neuropsychologic performance (r = 0.13-0.23, P < .05) and largely physical activities correlated with physical performance (r = 0.15-0.46, P < .05).

Conclusions: Quantifying the degree of cognitive and/or physical demand for completing a specific task adds an additional dimension to standard measures of functional assessment. This additional information may significantly influence decisions about rehabilitation, postacute care needs, treatment plans, and caregiver education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Difference in Mean Cognitive Ratings and Mean Physical Ratings By Expert Panel Difference scores between mean cognitive and mean physical ratings of 16 items by the expert panel is shown graphically. Positive values indicate greater cognitive than physical demand; negative values indicate more physical than cognitive demand. More Cognitive Items: IADL managing money, IADL medications, IADL telephone, IADL prepare meals; More Physical Items: SF12 climbing stairs, ADL transfer, SF12 moderate activities, ADL walking ADL = basic Activities of Daily Living; IADL = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; MOS SF-12 = Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form Survey Questionnaire; SD = standard deviation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
    1. Jack CR, Jr, Albert MS, Knopman DS, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:257–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kane RA, Kane RA. Assessing the elderly: A practical guide to measurement. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1981.
    1. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of Illness in the Aged. The Index of ADL: A Standardized Measure of Biological and Psychosocial Function JAMA. 1963;185:914–9. - PubMed
    1. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources