Long-term disability after lacunar stroke: secondary prevention of small subcortical strokes
- PMID: 25663222
- PMCID: PMC4352098
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001331
Long-term disability after lacunar stroke: secondary prevention of small subcortical strokes
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether vascular and demographic factors predict worsening disability up to 8 years after lacunar stroke.
Methods: SPS3 (Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes) was a clinical trial in lacunar stroke patients with annual assessment of disability using the Older Americans Resources and Survey instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale (range 0-14). Generalized estimating equations modeled the likelihood of disability (IADL <14) over time, adjusting for demographics, medical risk factors, cognition, mood, stroke location, and geographic region in univariate and multivariable models. IADL assessments after recurrent stroke were censored. We stratified by study region and age quartile.
Results: Among 2,820 participants, mean age was 63.4 years (SD 10.8), 63% were male, 36% had diabetes, 90% hypertension, and 10% prior stroke. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years. In multivariable models, female sex, education, diabetes, nonregular alcohol use, prior stroke, Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument score, depression, mild cognitive impairment, and stroke location were associated with disability. The youngest age quartile had decreased odds of disability over time (odds ratio 0.90 per year, 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.95), whereas the oldest age quartile had increased odds (2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.75-2.75). Americans and Latin Americans had >2-fold greater odds of disability per year compared with Spaniards (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: In lacunar stroke patients, older age was associated with worsening long-term disability, even without recurrence. Worse long-term function was associated with diabetes, cognitive status, and prior stroke, and regional differences may be attributable to variations in health care delivery or scale interpretation.
© 2015 American Academy of Neurology.
Figures
References
-
- Dombovy ML, Sandok BA, Basford JR. Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. Stroke 1986;17:363–369. - PubMed
-
- de Groot-Driessen D, van de Sande P, van Heugten C. Speed of finger tapping as a predictor of functional outcome after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:40–44. - PubMed
-
- Pan SL, Lien IN, Yen MF, Lee TK, Chen TH. Dynamic aspect of functional recovery after stroke using a multistate model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1054–1060. - PubMed
-
- Hankey GJ, Spiesser J, Hakimi Z, Bego G, Carita P, Gabriel S. Rate, degree, and predictors of recovery from disability following ischemic stroke. Neurology 2007;68:1583–1587. - PubMed
-
- Johnston M, Pollard B, Morrison V, MacWalter R. Functional limitations and survival following stroke: psychological and clinical predictors of 3-year outcome. Int J Behav Med 2004;11:187–196. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources