Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Sep;16(3):237-43.
doi: 10.1007/s10195-015-0335-1. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

A prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study of migration and bone remodeling after implantation of two modern short-stemmed femoral prostheses

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study of migration and bone remodeling after implantation of two modern short-stemmed femoral prostheses

Volker Brinkmann et al. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to analyze migration and strain transmission of the Metha™ and Nanos™ femoral prostheses.

Materials and methods: Between 1 January 2011 and 2 April 2013, 50 patients were randomized to receive short-stemmed femoral prostheses. Metha™ stems were implanted in 24 patients (12 female, 12 male; mean age 58.7 years; mean body mass index [BMI] 27.4) and Nanos™ stems in 26 patients (10 female, 16 male; mean age 59.7 years; mean BMI 27.1). Longitudinal stem migration, varus-valgus alignment, changes of center of rotation (COR), femoral offset and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle, leg length discrepancy, periprosthetic radiolucent lines incidence, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were analysed after an average of 98 and 381 days.

Results: There was no significant change of varus-valgus alignment or clinically relevant migration of the Metha™ or Nanos™ prostheses during postoperative follow-up. After 12.3 months, the DEXA scans showed small but significant differences of bone mineral density in Gruen zones 1 (minus ~8 %) and 6 (plus ~9 %) for the Metha™ and in Gruen zone 1 (minus ~14 %) for the Nanos™ (paired t test). Visual analog scale (VAS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved significantly for both implants (Nanos™/Metha™ 12.3 months postoperatively HSS 96.5/96.2; VAS 0.7/0.8, respectively). COR or offset did not change significantly after surgery.

Conclusions: Neither implant showed signs of impaired osseointegration. DEXA demonstrated proximally located load transfer with only moderate proximal stress shielding.

Level of evidence: II.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of DEXA of the Nanos™ (right) and Metha™ (left) prosthesis with defined modified Gruen zones

References

    1. Gulow J, Scholz R, von Freiherr S-S. Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopade. 2007;36:353–359. doi: 10.1007/s00132-007-1071-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen HH, Morrey BF, An KN, Luo ZP. Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:945–950. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Falez F, Casella F, Panegrossi G, Favetti F, Barresi C. Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems. J Orthop Traumatol. 2008;9:49–54. doi: 10.1007/s10195-008-0105-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilbert RE, Salehi-Bird S, Gallacher PD, Shaylor P. The mayo conservative hip: experience from a district general hospital. Hip Int. 2009;19:211–214. - PubMed
    1. Gotze C, Ehrenbrink J, Ehrenbrink H. Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty. Z Orthop Unfall. 2010;148:398–405. - PubMed

Publication types