Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Apr;220(4):716-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.020. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

Pancreas transplantation in C-peptide positive patients: does "type" of diabetes really matter?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pancreas transplantation in C-peptide positive patients: does "type" of diabetes really matter?

Robert J Stratta et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: In the past, type 2 (C-peptide positive) diabetes mellitus (DM) was a contraindication for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT).

Study design: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes in SPKT recipients according to pretransplantation C-peptide levels ≥ 2.0 ng/mL or < 2.0 ng/mL.

Results: From November 2001 to March 2013, we performed 162 SPKTs including 30 (18.5%) in patients with C-peptide levels ≥ 2.0 ng/mL pretransplantation (C-peptide positive group, range 2.1 to 12.4 ng/mL) and 132 in patients with absent or low C-peptide levels (<2.0 ng/mL, C-peptide "negative"). C-peptide positive patients were older at SPKT, had a later age of onset and shorter duration of pretransplantation DM, and more were African-American (all p < 0.05) compared with C-peptide negative patients. With a mean follow-up of 5.6 years, patient (80% vs 82.6%), kidney graft (63.3% vs 68.9%), and pancreas graft survivals (50% vs 62.1%, all p = NS) rates were comparable in C-peptide positive and negative patients, respectively. At latest follow-up, there were no differences in acute rejection episodes, surgical complications, major infections, readmissions, hemoglobin A1c levels, serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate levels between the 2 groups. C-peptide levels were higher (mean 5.0 vs 2.6 ng/mL, p < 0.05) and post-transplant weight gain (≥ 5 kg) was more common (57% vs 33%, p = 0.004) in the C-peptide positive group. Survival outcomes in C-peptide positive (n = 14) vs C-peptide negative (n = 22) African-American patients were similar, as were outcomes in C-peptide positive patients with a body mass index < or ≥ 28 kg/m(2).

Conclusions: Patients with higher pretransplantion C-peptide levels appear to have a type 2 DM phenotype compared to insulinopenic patients undergoing SPKT. However, survival and functional outcomes were similar, suggesting that pretransplantation C-peptide levels should not be used exclusively to determine candidacy for SPKT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Discussion.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):727-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.048. J Am Coll Surg. 2015. PMID: 25797759 No abstract available.

Publication types