Refining American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM stage and prognostic groups for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinomas
- PMID: 25667292
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.6412
Refining American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM stage and prognostic groups for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinomas
Abstract
Purpose: To refine stage and prognostic group for human papillomavirus (HPV) -related nonmetastatic (M0) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC).
Methods: All patients with nonmetastatic (M0) p16-confirmed OPC treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy from 2000 to 2010 were included. Overall survival (OS) was compared among TNM stages for patients with HPV-related and HPV-unrelated OPC separately. For HPV-related OPC, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) derived new RPA stages objectively. Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) to derive AHR stages. The performance of survival prediction of RPA stage and AHR stage was assessed against the current seventh edition TNM stages. Prognostic groups were derived by RPA, combining RPA stage and nonanatomic factors.
Results: The cohort comprised 573 patients with HPV-related OPC and 237 patients with HPV-unrelated OPC, with a median follow-up of 5.1 years. Lower 5-year OS with higher TNM stage was evident for patients with HPV-unrelated OPC (stage I, II, III, and IV 5-year OS: 70%, 58%, 50%, and 30%, respectively; P = .004) but not for patients with HPV-related OPC (stage I, II, III, and IV 5-year OS: 88%, 78%, 71%, and 74%, respectively; P = .56). RPA divided HPV-related OPC into RPA-I (T1-3N0-2b), RPA-II (T1-3N2c), and RPA-III (T4 or N3; 5-year OS: 82%, 76%, and 54%, respectively; P < .001). AHR also yielded a valid classification, but RPA stage demonstrated better survival prediction. A further RPA (including RPA stage, age, and smoking pack-years [PYs]) derived the following four valid prognostic groups for survival: group I (T1-3N0-N2c_≤ 20 PY), group II (T1-3N0-N2c_> 20 PY), group III (T4 or N3_age ≤ 70), and group IVA (T4 or N3_age > 70; 5-year OS: 89%, 64%, 57%, and 40%, respectively; P < .001).
Conclusion: An RPA-based TNM stage grouping (stage I/II/III: T1-3N0-N2b/T1-3N2c/T4 or N3, with M1 as stage IV) is proposed for HPV-related OPC as a result of significantly improved survival prediction compared with the seventh edition TNM, and prognostication is further improved by an RPA-based prognostic grouping within the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM framework for HPV-related OPC.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Comment in
-
Different strokes for different folks: new paradigms for staging oropharynx cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):817-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.1757. Epub 2015 Feb 9. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25667276 No abstract available.
-
Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: Agree With a New Staging System, but the Devil Is in the Details.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3217-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1565. Epub 2015 Jul 27. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26215957 No abstract available.
-
Reply to J.J. Beitler et al.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3218-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.5715. Epub 2015 Jul 27. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26215961 No abstract available.
-
Human Papillomavirus and Oropharyngeal Cancer Stage.J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;34(16):1833-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.6081. Epub 2016 Apr 25. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27114590 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources