Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jan 23:5:1.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00001. eCollection 2015.

Systematic review of interventions to improve the provision of information for adults with primary brain tumors and their caregivers

Danette Langbecker  1 , Monika Janda  2
Affiliations
Review

Systematic review of interventions to improve the provision of information for adults with primary brain tumors and their caregivers

Danette Langbecker et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Adults with primary brain tumors and their caregivers have significant information needs. This review assessed the effect of interventions to improve information provision for adult primary brain tumor patients and/or their caregivers.

Methods: We included randomized or non-randomized trials testing educational interventions that had outcomes of information provision, knowledge, understanding, recall, or satisfaction with the intervention, for adults diagnosed with primary brain tumors and/or their family or caregivers. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Reviews databases were searched for studies published between 1980 and June 2014.

Results: Two randomized controlled, 1 non-randomized controlled, and 10 single group pre-post trials enrolled more than 411 participants. Five group, four practice/process change, and four individual interventions assessed satisfaction (12 studies), knowledge (4 studies), and information provision (2 studies). Nine studies reported high rates of satisfaction. Three studies showed statistically significant improvements over time in knowledge and two showed greater information was provided to intervention than control group participants, although statistical testing was not performed.

Discussion: The trials assessed intermediate outcomes such as satisfaction, and only 4/13 reported on knowledge improvements. Few trials had a randomized controlled design and risk of bias was either evident or could not be assessed in most domains.

Keywords: brain tumor; caregivers; doctor–patient communication; information; neuro-oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Inclusion/exclusion process following article search.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ream E, Richardson A. The role of information in patients’ adaptation to chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care (1996) 5:132–8.10.1111/j.1365-2354.1996.tb00223.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fallowfield L, Ford S, Lewis S. No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer. Psychooncology (1995) 4:197–20210.1002/pon.2960040305 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kitamura T. Stress-reductive effects of information disclosure to medical and psychiatric patients. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2005) 59:627–33.10.1111/j.1440-1819.2005.01428.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elkin EB, Kim SH, Casper ES, Kissane DW, Schrag D. Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians’ perceptions. J Clin Oncol (2007) 25:5275–80.10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruera E. Process and content of decision making by advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol (2006) 24:1029–3010.1200/JCO.2005.05.2472 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources