Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;22(3):553-64.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu023. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

Feasibility and utility of applications of the common data model to multiple, disparate observational health databases

Erica A Voss  1 , Rupa Makadia  2 , Amy Matcho  2 , Qianli Ma  2 , Chris Knoll  2 , Martijn Schuemie  2 , Frank J DeFalco  2 , Ajit Londhe  3 , Vivienne Zhu  2 , Patrick B Ryan  2
Affiliations

Feasibility and utility of applications of the common data model to multiple, disparate observational health databases

Erica A Voss et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the utility of applying the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) across multiple observational databases within an organization and to apply standardized analytics tools for conducting observational research.

Materials and methods: Six deidentified patient-level datasets were transformed to the OMOP CDM. We evaluated the extent of information loss that occurred through the standardization process. We developed a standardized analytic tool to replicate the cohort construction process from a published epidemiology protocol and applied the analysis to all 6 databases to assess time-to-execution and comparability of results.

Results: Transformation to the CDM resulted in minimal information loss across all 6 databases. Patients and observations excluded were due to identified data quality issues in the source system, 96% to 99% of condition records and 90% to 99% of drug records were successfully mapped into the CDM using the standard vocabulary. The full cohort replication and descriptive baseline summary was executed for 2 cohorts in 6 databases in less than 1 hour.

Discussion: The standardization process improved data quality, increased efficiency, and facilitated cross-database comparisons to support a more systematic approach to observational research. Comparisons across data sources showed consistency in the impact of inclusion criteria, using the protocol and identified differences in patient characteristics and coding practices across databases.

Conclusion: Standardizing data structure (through a CDM), content (through a standard vocabulary with source code mappings), and analytics can enable an institution to apply a network-based approach to observational research across multiple, disparate observational health databases.

Keywords: controlled health services research; database; factual vocabulary; medical informatics observational study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Visualizations on observation data in the CDM. Abbreviations: CDM, Common Data Model; Premier, Premier Perspective; Optum, Optum Clinformatics DataMart; CPRD, Clinical Practice Research Datalink; Truven CCAE, Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters; Truven MDCD, Truven Health MarketScan Medicaid; Truven MDCR, Truven Health MarketScan Medicare Supplemental.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Schneeweiss S, Avorn J. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(4):323–337. - PubMed
    1. Brookhart MA, Stürmer T, Glynn RJ, Rassen J, Schneeweiss S. Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches. Med Care. 2010;48(6):S114–S120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Madigan D, Stang PE, Berlin JA, et al. A systematic statistical approach to evaluating evidence from observational studies. Ann Rev Stat Appl. 2014;1(1):11–39.
    1. Psaty BM, Furberg CD. COX-2 inhibitors–lessons in drug safety. N Engl J Med. 2005;352 (11):1133–1135. - PubMed
    1. Reisinger SJ, Ryan PB, O’Hara DJ, et al. Development and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databases. JAMIA 2010;17 (6):652–662. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types