Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun;15(2):395-415.
doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0334-y.

Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach

Affiliations
Review

Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach

Andrew Westbrook et al. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Cognitive effort has been implicated in numerous theories regarding normal and aberrant behavior and the physiological response to engagement with demanding tasks. Yet, despite broad interest, no unifying, operational definition of cognitive effort itself has been proposed. Here, we argue that the most intuitive and epistemologically valuable treatment is in terms of effort-based decision-making, and advocate a neuroeconomics-focused research strategy. We first outline psychological and neuroscientific theories of cognitive effort. Then we describe the benefits of a neuroeconomic research strategy, highlighting how it affords greater inferential traction than do traditional markers of cognitive effort, including self-reports and physiologic markers of autonomic arousal. Finally, we sketch a future series of studies that can leverage the full potential of the neuroeconomic approach toward understanding the cognitive and neural mechanisms that give rise to phenomenal, subjective cognitive effort.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Titration of an offer to repeat the one-back task versus $2 for a higher N-back level
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Falling subjective value reflects increasing discounting with task demands, for younger (YA) and older (OA) adults
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
COGED predicts delay discounting as measured by the area under the discounting curve (AUC). Lower AUC means steeper discounting

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alessi SM, Petry NM. Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behavioural Processes. 2003;64:345–354. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00150-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus–norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2005;28:403–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnes A, Bullmore ET, Suckling J. Endogenous human brain dynamics recover slowly following cognitive effort. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006626.t001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basten U, Biele G, Heekeren HR, Fiebach CJ. How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107:21767–21772. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908104107. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beatty J, Lucero-Wagoner B. The pupillary system. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG, editors. Handbook of psychophysiology. 2. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2000. pp. 142–162.

LinkOut - more resources