Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 31:9:1-6.
doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010001. eCollection 2015.

The humelock hemiarthoplasty device for both primary and failed management of proximal humerus fractures: a case series

Affiliations

The humelock hemiarthoplasty device for both primary and failed management of proximal humerus fractures: a case series

Ikram A et al. Open Orthop J. .

Abstract

Fractures of the proximal humerus account for 4-5% of all fractures. Managing proximal humerus fractures operatively and non-operatively have their respective complications both short- and long-term. We present our experience using the Humelock hemiarthoplasty device for both primary and failed management of proximal humeral fractures. We present four different examples from ten cases that include a failure of internal fixation, a failure of intramedullary nailing, a complex case in a patient with multiple co-morbidities, and a failure of nonoperative management. The patients in our series had multiple injuries and the device allowed early mobilization and produced good results. We suggest that this device has a role in the failure of primary and secondary management of proximal humeral fractures in a district general hospital setting.

Keywords: Early mobilization; Humelock hemiarthroplasty; failure; proximal humerus..

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
(a, b) 13 months postoperative after initial conservative management, and then with a PHILOS plate which is seen cutting out. (c) Revision using humelock hemiarthroplasty.
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2)
(a) Initial injury, (b) 3 days later intraoperative, (c) 8 weeks postoperatively, (d) 12 weeks postoperatively, (e, f) During revision surgery, 13 weeks following index surgery.
Fig. (3)
Fig. (3)
(a, b) X-ray after injury, (c) Intraoperative x-ray.
Fig. (4)
Fig. (4)
(a) Initial injury, (b) 8 weeks later, (c) 16 weeks later, (d) intraoperative (e) 16 weeks postoperatively.

References

    1. Browner B, Jupiter J, Levine A, Trafton P, Green A, Norris T. Proximal humerus fractures and fracture dis- locations.Skeletal trauma basic scence management and reconstruction. 3rd ed. Philadelphia Saunders. 2003:1532–624.
    1. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, Mc-Queen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:365–71. - PubMed
    1. Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures II.Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1090–103. - PubMed
    1. Gerber C, Werner CM, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:848–55. - PubMed
    1. Cadet ER, Ahmad CS. Hemiarthroplasty for three and four part proximal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20:17–27. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources