Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1989 Jun 24;1(8652):1418-20.
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90126-8.

Nebulised salbutamol with and without ipratropium bromide in acute airflow obstruction

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Nebulised salbutamol with and without ipratropium bromide in acute airflow obstruction

B R O'Driscoll et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

103 patients with acute airflow obstruction (56 asthma, 47 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) completed a double-blind trial of nebulised bronchodilator treatment in a hospital accident and emergency department. Each patient was randomised to receive either 10 mg of salbutamol nebuliser solution in 2 ml of saline or 10 mg of salbutamol in 2 ml (0.5 mg) of preservative-free ipratropium bromide. Peak flow rate (PFR) was recorded before treatment and 1 hour after beginning nebulised treatment. In 23 asthmatic patients given salbutamol alone PFR rose by a mean 31% 1 hour after treatment whereas in 33 such patients given combined treatment it rose by a mean 77% (95% confidence interval for the difference 8-84%). Patients whose PFR was below 140 l/min at entry gained maximum benefit from the combined treatment. For COPD patients the PFR rise was almost identical for both treatments. In acute asthma the immediate PFR response to a mixture of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide was better than the response to nebulised salbutamol alone. For COPD patients, the two treatments were of equal benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

MeSH terms