Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;58(3):767-80.
doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0063.

Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia

Rebecca Hunting Pompon, Malcolm R McNeil, Kristie A Spencer, Diane L Kendall

Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia

Rebecca Hunting Pompon et al. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: The integrity of selective attention in people with aphasia (PWA) is currently unknown. Selective attention is essential for everyday communication, and inhibition is an important part of selective attention. This study explored components of inhibition-both intentional and reactive inhibition-during spoken-word production in PWA and in controls who were neurologically healthy (HC). Intentional inhibition is the ability to suppress a response to interference, and reactive inhibition is the delayed reactivation of a previously suppressed item.

Method: Nineteen PWA and 20 age- and education-matched HC participated in a Stroop spoken-word production task. This task allowed the examination of intentional and reactive inhibition by evoking and comparing interference, facilitation, and negative priming effects in different contexts.

Results: Although both groups demonstrated intentional inhibition, PWA demonstrated significantly more interference effects. PWA demonstrated no significant facilitation effects. HC demonstrated significant reverse facilitation effects. Neither group showed significant evidence of reactive inhibition, though both groups showed similar individual variability.

Conclusions: These results underscore the challenge interference presents for PWA during spoken-word production, indicating diminished intentional inhibition. Although reactive inhibition was not different between PWA and HC, PWA showed difficulty integrating and adapting to contextual information during language tasks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean response latencies in milliseconds/log for both groups on all condition comparisons. Whiskers indicate 1 SD above and below the mean. Significance (p < .005) is indicated (a) between groups with bracket and star and (b) within groups with star over both conditions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Andrés P., Guerrini C., Phillips L. H., & Perfect T. J. (2008). Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 101–123. - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A. D. (1993). Working memory or working attention. In Baddeley A. D., & Weiskrantz L. (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness and control; A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 152–170). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    1. Botvinick M. M., Braver T. S., Barch D. M., Carter C. S., & Cohen J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. - PubMed
    1. Catena A., Fuentes L. J., & Tudela P. (2002). Priming and interference effects can be disassociated in the Stroop task: New evidence in favor of automaticity of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 113–118. - PubMed
    1. Cohen J. D., Dunbar K., & McClelland J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361. - PubMed

Publication types