Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 13:5:8444.
doi: 10.1038/srep08444.

Quantum speed limits in open systems: non-Markovian dynamics without rotating-wave approximation

Affiliations

Quantum speed limits in open systems: non-Markovian dynamics without rotating-wave approximation

Zhe Sun et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

We derive an easily computable quantum speed limit (QSL) time bound for open systems whose initial states can be chosen as either pure or mixed states. Moreover, this QSL time is applicable to either Markovian or non-Markovian dynamics. By using of a hierarchy equation method, we numerically study the QSL time bound in a qubit system interacting with a single broadened cavity mode without rotating-wave, Born and Markovian approximation. By comparing with rotating-wave approximation (RWA) results, we show that the counter-rotating terms are helpful to increase evolution speed. The problem of non-Markovianity is also considered. We find that for non-RWA cases, increasing system-bath coupling can not always enhance the non-Markovianity, which is qualitatively different from the results with RWA. When considering the relation between QSL and non-Markovianity, we find that for small broadening widths of the cavity mode, non-Markovianity can increase the evolution speed in either RWA or non-RWA cases, while, for larger broadening widths, it is not true for non-RWA cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Quantum speed limit time versus different parameter γ (in units of ω0).
The initial state is pure state. Different QSL time definitions are shown. formula image are derived from the operator norm, trace norm and Hilbert-Schmidt norm in Ref. . The actual driving time τ = 30.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Quantum speed limit time versus different parameter γ (in units of ω0). The broadening-width parameter λ = 0.03 (in units of ω0). The initial state is chosen as a mixed state in Eq. (19) with mixed parameter p = 0.8. (b) Measure of non-Markovianity M versus different parameter γ. The cases of non-RWA (black solid line with dots) and RWA (blue solid line with circles) are plotted. The actual driving time τ = 30.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Quantum speed limit time versus different parameter γ (in units of ω0). The broadening-width parameter λ = 0.1 (in units of ω0). (b) Measure of non-Markovianity versus different parameter γ. The cases of non-RWA (black solid line with dots) and RWA (blue solid line with circles) are plotted. The initial state and other parameters are chosen as Fig. 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Quantum speed limit time versus different parameter γ (in units of ω0). The broadening-width parameter λ = 0.6 (in units of ω0). (b) Measure of non-Markovianity versus different parameter γ. The cases of non-RWA (black solid line with dots) and RWA (blue solid line with circles) are plotted. The initial state and other parameters are chosen as Fig. 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) For the non-RWA case, we plot quantum speed limit time versus different parameter γ (in units of ω0). The broadening-width parameter λ = 0.6 (in units of ω0). Different initial states are studied by choosing different parameters p = 1, 0.7, 0.4, 0.1. For comparison, we plot the RWA case in (b).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lloyd S. Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature 406, 1047; 10.1038/35023282 (2000). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lloyd S. & Maccone L. Advances in quantum metrology. Nature Photonics 5, 222; 10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 (2011). - DOI
    1. Alipour S., Mehboudi M. & Rezakhani A. T. Quantum Metrology in Open Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120405; 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.120405 (2014). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caneva T. et al. Optimal Control at the Quantum Speed Limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 240501; 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.240501 (2009). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hegerfeldt G. C. Driving at the Quantum Speed Limit: Optimal Control of a Two-Level System. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 260501; 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.260501 (2013). - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources