Femoral Revision Using the Wagner SL Revision Stem: A Single-Surgeon Experience Featuring 11-19 Years of Follow-Up
- PMID: 25677935
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.024
Femoral Revision Using the Wagner SL Revision Stem: A Single-Surgeon Experience Featuring 11-19 Years of Follow-Up
Abstract
Seventy-four revisions of the femoral component featuring placement of a Wagner stem in 74 patients operated upon between 1995 and 2003 were reviewed. Clinical evaluation, radiological assessment, and survival analysis of revision stems were conducted. The mean follow-up duration was 14.4 years (range, 11 to 19 years). When failure was defined as stem removal for any reason, 4 of 64 stems had to be further revised during the follow-up period, yielding a cumulative stem survival rate of 93.8% (95% CI: 87.7% to 98.2%) at 18 years. The Wagner revision stem is an effective implant for revision hip surgery when bone stock is lacking. Use of the stem affords mechanical stability even when bone loss is massive.
Keywords: Wagner SL Stem; clinical outcome; extended trochanteric osteotomy; femoral revision; hip arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):186-192. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5091-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 27672012 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.Surg Technol Int. 2013 Sep;23:243-50. Surg Technol Int. 2013. PMID: 24081844 Clinical Trial.
-
[Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2001;68(3):148-61. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2001. PMID: 11706537 Czech.
-
Megaprostheses in the Revision of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical Series and Literature Review.Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73(4):229-32. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015. PMID: 26630464 Review.
-
Bypass fixation.Orthop Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;29(2):319-29. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70330-8. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998. PMID: 9553577 Review.
Cited by
-
Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):186-192. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5091-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 27672012 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 13;59(10):1822. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101822. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37893539 Free PMC article.
-
CORR Insights(®): Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):421-2. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4524-2. Epub 2015 Aug 25. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 26304044 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Tapered, Fluted Monobloc Stem: A Retrospective Long-Term Analysis of 121 Cases.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 1;14(7):2409. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072409. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40217859 Free PMC article.
-
Distal fixation stems for revision of total hip replacement.J Orthop. 2021 Feb 21;24:151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.031. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr. J Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33716420 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical