Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Jan 30:9:707-16.
doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S78070. eCollection 2015.

Steroid for epidural injection in spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Steroid for epidural injection in spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kuan Liu et al. Drug Des Devel Ther. .

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Methods: We performed a search on the CENTRAL, Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases up to September 2014. We recovered 17 original articles, of which only 10 were in full compliance with the randomized controlled trial (RCT) criteria. These articles were reviewed in an independent and blinded way by two reviewers who were previously trained to extract data and score their quality by the criteria of the Cochrane Handbook (5.1.0).

Results: We accepted ten studies with 1,010 participants. There is minimal evidence that shows that epidural steroid injections are better than lidocaine alone, regardless of the mode of epidural injection. There is a fair short-term and long-term benefit for treating spinal stenosis with local anesthetic and steroids.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that epidural steroid injections provide limited improvement in short-term and long-term benefits in LSS patients.

Keywords: chronic pain; epidural injection; local anesthetic; lumbar spinal stenosis; steroid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study identification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias summary: a review of authors’ judgments about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yaksi A, Ozgonenel L, Ozgonenel B. The efficiency of gabapentin therapy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32(9):939–942. - PubMed
    1. Suri P, Rainville J, Kalichman L, Katz JN. Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis? JAMA. 2010;304(23):2628–2636. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):818–825. - PubMed
    1. Fanuele JC, Birkmeyer NJ, Abdu WA, Tosteson TD, Weinstein JN. The impact of spinal problems on the health status of patients: Have we underestimated the effect? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25(12):1509–1514. - PubMed
    1. Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;251:67–68. - PubMed

MeSH terms