Language did not spring forth 100,000 years ago
- PMID: 25679377
- PMCID: PMC4332681
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002064
Language did not spring forth 100,000 years ago
Abstract
In response to an Essay by Johan Bolhuis and co-authors, Phillip Lieberman contends that rather than arising from a key recent innovation ("merge"), language arose by gradual evolution of ancient capabilities.
Conflict of interest statement
The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
Comment in
-
Language: UG or not to be, that is the question.PLoS Biol. 2015 Feb 13;13(2):e1002063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002063. eCollection 2015 Feb. PLoS Biol. 2015. PMID: 25679209 Free PMC article.
Comment on
-
How could language have evolved?PLoS Biol. 2014 Aug 26;12(8):e1001934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934. eCollection 2014 Aug. PLoS Biol. 2014. PMID: 25157536 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martin A, Chao LL (2001) Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11: 194–201. - PubMed
-
- Chomsky N (2012) The science of language Cambridge (Massachusetts): Cambridge University Press; 10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.06.010 - DOI
-
- Chomsky N (1988) Language and problems of knowledge Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press;
-
- Postal P. (1988) Advances in linguistic rhetoric. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 129–137.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
