Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0116629.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116629. eCollection 2015.

Barriers to advance care planning at the end of life: an explanatory systematic review of implementation studies

Susi Lund  1 , Alison Richardson  2 , Carl May  2
Affiliations

Barriers to advance care planning at the end of life: an explanatory systematic review of implementation studies

Susi Lund et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Context: Advance Care Plans (ACPs) enable patients to discuss and negotiate their preferences for the future including treatment options at the end of life. Their implementation poses significant challenges.

Objective: To investigate barriers and facilitators to the implementation of ACPs, focusing on their workability and integration in clinical practice.

Design: An explanatory systematic review of qualitative implementation studies.

Data sources: Empirical studies that reported interventions designed to support ACP in healthcare. Web of Knowledge, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, British Nursing Index and PubMed databases were searched.

Methods: Direct content analysis, using Normalization Process Theory, to identify and characterise relevant components of implementation processes.

Results: 13 papers identified from 166 abstracts were included in the review. Key factors facilitating implementation were: specially prepared staff utilizing a structured approach to interactions around ACPs. Barriers to implementation were competing demands of other work, the emotional and interactional nature of patient-professional interactions around ACPs, problems in sharing decisions and preferences within and between healthcare organizations.

Conclusions: This review demonstrates that doing more of the things that facilitate delivery of ACPs will not reduce the effects of those things that undermine them. Structured tools are only likely to be partially effective and the creation of a specialist cadre of ACP facilitators is unlikely to be a sustainable solution. The findings underscore both the challenge and need to find ways to routinely incorporate ACPs in clinical settings where multiple and competing demands impact on practice. Interventions most likely to meet with success are those that make elements of Advance Care Planning workable within complex and time pressured clinical workflows.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flowchart.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Operationalizing Advance Care Plans: Facilitators.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Operationalizing Advance Care Plans: Barriers.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (2012) Time to interevene? Available: http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2012cap.htm accessed 2014 June 25.
    1. Conroy S, Fade P, Fraser A, Schiff R (2009) Advance care planning: concise evidence-based guidelines. Clinical Medicine 9: 76–79. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department of Health (2008) End of Life Care Strategy: Promoting high quality care for adults at the end of their life. London: COI.
    1. Lovell A, Yates P (2014) Advance Care Planning in palliative care: A systematic literature review of the contextual factors influencing its uptake 2008–2012. Palliative Medicine 28: 1026–1035. 10.1177/0269216314531313 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhee JJ, Zwar NA (2011) How is advance care planning conceptualised in Australia? Findings from key informant interviews. Australian Health Review 35: 197–203. 10.1071/AH10883 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types