Bridging the undergraduate curriculum using an integrated course-embedded undergraduate research experience (ICURE)
- PMID: 25681416
- PMCID: PMC4353079
- DOI: 10.1187/cbe.14-09-0151
Bridging the undergraduate curriculum using an integrated course-embedded undergraduate research experience (ICURE)
Erratum in
-
Correction for Bridging the Undergraduate Curriculum Using an Integrated Course-Embedded Undergraduate Research Experience (ICURE).CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1):co3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-09-0151-corr. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017. PMID: 28188278 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
The traditional undergraduate program of study incorporates a selection of classes that represent a broad spectrum of subdisciplines. Unfortunately, few curricula successfully integrate concepts in all subdisciplines, giving undergraduates the misconception that there is a lack of application or connectedness between class subjects. An integrated course-embedded research experience (ICURE) was initiated to redress this problem by bridging classes within one discipline in an effort to engage undergraduates in a long-term analysis of biodiversity. The approach was both inclusive and longitudinal: 1) the ICURE bridge brought students from different classes and levels of instruction together with faculty members in a research project with a common goal-chronicling the changing face of the local environment in biological terms; and 2) research data collected were maintained and supplemented each semester and year in an online biodiversity database. Analysis of content and attitudinal gains suggested the integrated research protocol increased student comprehension and confidence. Results are discussed in terms of future amendments to instructional design and potential research applications. Though this program was concentrated on one discipline, there is no reason to assume other disciplines could not take advantage of similar research connections.
© 2015 J. E. Russell et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2015 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).
Figures



References
-
- American Association for the Advancement of Science . Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action. Washington DC: 2011.
-
- Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University . Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. Stony Brook: State University of New York; 1998.
-
- Brynhildsen J, Dahle LO, Fallsberg MB, Rundquist I, Hammer M. Attitudes among students and teachers on vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Teach. 2002;24:286–288. - PubMed
-
- Dahle LO, Brynhildsen J, Fallsberg MB, Rundquist I, Hammer M. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: examples and experiences from Linköping, Sweden. Med Teach. 2002;24:280–285. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases