Interpretability of the PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales and Gastrointestinal Worry Scales in Pediatric Patients With Functional and Organic Gastrointestinal Diseases
- PMID: 25682210
- PMCID: PMC4469917
- DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv005
Interpretability of the PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales and Gastrointestinal Worry Scales in Pediatric Patients With Functional and Organic Gastrointestinal Diseases
Abstract
Objective: The present study investigates the clinical interpretability of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales and Worry Scales in pediatric patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders or organic gastrointestinal diseases in comparison with healthy controls.
Methods: The PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Scales were completed by 587 patients with gastrointestinal disorders/diseases and 685 parents, and 513 healthy children and 337 parents. Minimal important difference (MID) scores were derived from the standard error of measurement (SEM). Cut-points were derived based on one and two standard deviations (SDs) from the healthy reference means.
Results: The percentages of patients below the scales' cut-points were significantly greater than the healthy controls (most p values ≤ .001). Scale scores 2 SDs from the healthy reference means were within the range of scores for pediatric patients with a gastrointestinal disorder. MID values were generated using the SEM.
Conclusions: The findings support the clinical interpretability of the new PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales and Worry Scales.
Keywords: PedsQL.; gastrointestinal symptoms; minimal important difference; patient-reported outcomes.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
References
-
- Bjorner J. B., Rose M., Gandek B., Stone A. A., Junghaenel D. U., Ware J. E. (2014). Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: An IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative. Quality of Life Research, 23, 217–227. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Calvert M., Blazeby J., Altman D. G., Revicki D. A., Moher D., Brundage M. D. (2013). Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: The CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA, 309, 814–822. - PubMed
-
- Carle A. C., Blumberg S. J., Moore K. A., Mbwana K. (2011). Advanced psychometric methods for developing and evaluating cut-point-based indicators. Child Indicators Research, 4, 101–126.
-
- Chitkara D. K., Rawat D. J., Talley N. J. (2005). The epidemiology of childhood recurrent abdominal pain in Western countries: A systematic review. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 100, 1868–1875. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical