Transcrestal maxillary sinus augmentation: Summers' versus a piezoelectric technique--an experimental cadaver study
- PMID: 25682786
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.12546
Transcrestal maxillary sinus augmentation: Summers' versus a piezoelectric technique--an experimental cadaver study
Abstract
Objectives: Sinus floor augmentation using transalveolar techniques is a successful and predictable procedure. The aim of the study was to compare the performance of conventional hand instruments using mallets and osteotomes with that of piezoelectric-hydrodynamic devices for maxillary sinus floor elevation.
Material and methods: In 17 undamaged cadaver heads on randomly allocated sites, Schneiderian membrane elevation was carried out transcrestally using piezosurgery and a hydrodynamic device or by conventional hand instrumentation. After simulation of sinus augmentation by the use of a radiopaque impression material, a post-operative CT scan was carried out and volumes were determined. Statistic significant differences between the two methods were evaluated by nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test with P < 0.05.
Results: A mean graft volume of 0.29 ± 0.18 cm(3) (0.07-0.60 cm(3)) was measured for the Summers' technique compared to 0.39 ± 0.32 cm(3) (0.05-1.04 cm(3)) for the Sinus Physiolift(®) technique. There is no statistically significant difference with regard to trauma to the Schneiderian membrane or augmented volume.
Conclusions: Both techniques generate expedient augmentation volume in the posterior atrophic maxilla. The piezoelectric technique can be recommended as an alternative tool to graft the floor of human maxillary sinuses.
Keywords: Summers' technique; maxillary sinus augmentation; piezosurgery.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Sinus augmentation via transcrestal approach: a comparison between the balloon and osteotome technique in a cadaver study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Sep;24(9):985-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02506.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013. PMID: 22725990 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Conventional Transcrestal Sinus Lift and Ultrasound-Enhanced Transcrestal Hydrodynamic Cavitational Sinus Lift for the Filling of Subantral Space: A Human Cadaver Study.J Oral Implantol. 2015 Dec;41(6):657-61. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00038. Epub 2014 Sep 18. J Oral Implantol. 2015. PMID: 25232940
-
The incidence of maxillary sinus membrane perforation during endoscopically assessed crestal sinus floor elevation: a pilot study.J Oral Implantol. 2012 Aug;38(4):345-59. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00083. J Oral Implantol. 2012. PMID: 22913307 Clinical Trial.
-
Indirect osteotome maxillary sinus floor elevation: an update.J Oral Implantol. 2012 Dec;38(6):799-804. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00160. J Oral Implantol. 2012. PMID: 23317300 Review.
-
Piezosurgery applied to implant dentistry: clinical and biological aspects.J Oral Implantol. 2014 Jul;40 Spec No:401-8. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00196. J Oral Implantol. 2014. PMID: 25020222 Review.
Cited by
-
Radiographic Analysis of Graft Dimensional Changes in Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Study.Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;15(9):2964. doi: 10.3390/ma15092964. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35591298 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the accuracy of a dynamic navigation system when performing dental implant surgery with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A pilot study.J Dent Sci. 2023 Oct;18(4):1747-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Jan 2. J Dent Sci. 2023. PMID: 37799911 Free PMC article.
-
Piezosurgery in implant dentistry.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015 Nov 11;7:115-24. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S63466. eCollection 2015. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015. PMID: 26635486 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources