Comparison of copper T-200 with Lippes loop as a contraceptive device

Abstract

A comparison has been made between Lippes loop and T Cu 200 intra-uterine contraceptive device with respect to their acceptability and effectiveness in a developing country. A total of 1054 patients were studied; 697 with Lippes loop and 357 with T Cu 200. The ages of the patients ranged between 14 and 44 years, with a peak age of 21-25 years for T Cu 200 and 26-30 for Lippes loop. The event rates were similar but T Cu 200 displayed lower expulsion rate, lower intermenstrual bleeding rate and a lower incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease. The Lippes loop had lower event rate for the other parameters considered, pregnancy and pelvic pain. The continuation rate was similar for both devices. Both devices are useful for women who wish to space out their children but for those who wish to achieve effective contraception for more than 5 years, Lippes loop should be the IUD of choice.

PIP: A comparison has been made between Lippes loop and T Cu 200 intrauterine contraceptive device with respect to their acceptability and effectiveness in a developing country. A total of 1054 patients were studied: 697 with Lippes loop and 357 with T Cu 200. The ages of the patients ranged between 14 and 44 years, with a peak age of 21-25 years for T Cu 200 and 26-30 for Lippes loop. The event rates were similar but T Cu 200 displayed lower expulsion rate, lower intermenstrual bleeding rate, and a lower incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease. The Lippes loop had lower event rate for other parameters considered, pregnancy and pelvic pain. The continuation rate was similar for both devices. Both devices are useful for women who wish to space out their children but for those who wish to achieve effective contraception for more than 5 years, Lippes loop should be the IUD of choice. (Author's).