Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;56(2):144-9.
doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.144. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

Efficacy of scrotal Doppler ultrasonography with the Valsalva maneuver, standing position, and resting-Valsalva ratio for varicocele diagnosis

Affiliations

Efficacy of scrotal Doppler ultrasonography with the Valsalva maneuver, standing position, and resting-Valsalva ratio for varicocele diagnosis

Yoo Seok Kim et al. Korean J Urol. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine effectiveness of Valsalva maneuver and standing position on scrotal color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) for the varicocele diagnosis.

Materials and methods: We reviewed the physical examination and CDU finding in 87 patients who visited National Police Hospital from January 2011 to April 2014. Diameters of pampiniform plexus were measured bilaterally during resting and Valsalva maneuver in the supine position and standing position. We calculated the ratio of mean of maximal vein diameter (mMVD) during resting and Valsalva maneuver (resting-Valsalva ratio) and compared in the both position.

Results: In the resting and supine position, mMVD of varicocele testis units were 1.8 mm, 2.1 mm, 2.6 mm (grades I, II, III, respectively), and that of normal testis units (NTU) 1.2 mm. During Valsalva maneuver in the supine position, mMVD were 3.0 mm, 3.4 mm, 4.2 mm (grades I, II, III) vs 1.8 mm (NTU) (p=0.007, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). Average of resting-Valsalva ratio in the supine position were 0.69, 0.74, 0.74 (grades I, II, III) and 0.67 (NTU). Whereas in the resting and standing position, mMVD were 2.8 mm, 3.3 mm, 3.8 mm (grades I, II, III) and 1.8 mm (NTU) (p=0.002, p<0.001, p<0.001). During Valsalva maneuver in the standing position, mMVD were 5.0 mm, 5.8 mm, 6.6 mm (grades I, II, III) and 2.5 mm (NTU) (p=0.002, p<0.001, p<0.001). And average resting-Valsalva ratio were 0.76, 0.90, 0.71 (grades I, II, III) and 0.26 (NTU), which showed significant differences from all grades (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001).

Conclusions: It is suggested that the standing position and Valsalva maneuver during CDU could improve diagnostic ability for varicocele. Resting-Valsalva ratio in the standing position could be a new diagnostic index for varicocele diagnosis using CDU.

Keywords: Doppler ultrasonography; Valsalva maneuver; Varicocele.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Color Doppler ultrasonography of varicocele. Maximal venous diameters in the pampiniform plexus were measured during resting (A) and during a Valsalva maneuver (B) in the standing position.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Mean maximal vein diameter (mMVD) of varicocele testis units upon scrotal color Doppler ultrasonography in the supine position at rest. (B) mMVD of varicocele testis units upon scrotal color Doppler ultrasonography in the supine positing during a Valsalva maneuver. (C) Average resting-Valsalva ratio [=(mMVD during Valsalva-mMVD during resting)/mMVD during resting] in the supine position. Gr, grade. *mMVD of no varicocele units (mm)=1.8±0.9.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Mean maximal vein diameter (mMVD) of varicocele testis units upon scrotal color Doppler ultrasonography in the standing position at rest. (B) mMVD of varicocele testis units upon scrotal color Doppler ultrasonography in the standing position during a Valsalva maneuver. (C) Average resting-Valsalva ratio in the standing position. Gr, grade. *mMVD of no varicocele units (mm)=1.8±1.2. **mMVD of no varicocele units (mm)=2.5±0.3.

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Kovac JR. Kovac JR. J Urol. 2021 Oct;206(4):1007-1008. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001877.02. Epub 2021 Jul 23. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 34293922 No abstract available.

References

    1. Sigmund G, Gall H, Bahren W. Stop-type and shunt-type varicoceles: venographic findings. Radiology. 1987;163:105–110. - PubMed
    1. Cornud F, Belin X, Amar E, Delafontaine D, Helenon O, Moreau JF. Varicocele: strategies in diagnosis and treatment. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:536–545. - PubMed
    1. Arslan H, Sakarya ME, Atilla MK. Clinical value of power Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of varicocele. J Clin Ultrasound. 1998;26:229. - PubMed
    1. Greenberg SH. Varicocele and male fertility. Fertil Steril. 1977;28:699–706. - PubMed
    1. Cina A, Minnetti M, Pirronti T, Vittoria Spampinato M, Canade A, Oliva G, et al. Sonographic quantitative evaluation of scrotal veins in healthy subjects: normative values and implications for the diagnosis of varicocele. Eur Urol. 2006;50:345–350. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources