Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;76(1):39-42.
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390019. Epub 2014 Sep 13.

The costs of skull base surgery in the pediatric population

Affiliations

The costs of skull base surgery in the pediatric population

A L Stapleton et al. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives To determine the costs of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for pediatric skull base lesions. Methods Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients (ages 1 month to 19 years) treated for skull base lesions with EES from 1999 to 2013. Demographic and operative data were recorded. The cost of care for the surgical day, intensive care unit (ICU), floor, and total overall cost of inpatient stay were acquired from the finance department. Results A total of 160 pediatric patients undergoing EES for skull base lesions were identified. Of these, 55 patients had complete financial data available. The average total inpatient and surgical costs of care were $34, 056 per patient. Angiofibromas were the most costly: $59,051 per patient. Fibro-osseous lesions had the lowest costs: $10,931 per patient. The average ICU stay was 1.8 days at $4,577 per ICU day. The average acute care stay was 3.4 days at $1,961 per day. Overall length of stay was 4.5 days. Three cerebrospinal fluid leaks (4%) and two cases of meningitis (3%) occurred. One tracheostomy was required (1.5%). Conclusions EES is a cost-effective model for removal of skull base lesions in the pediatric population. Costs of care vary according to pathology, staged surgeries, length of ICU stay, and need for second operations.

Keywords: costs; endoscopic; pediatric; skull base.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rigante M, Massimi L, Parrilla C. et al.Endoscopic transsphenoidal approach versus microscopic approach in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(9):1132–1136. - PubMed
    1. Hayhurst C, Williams D, Yousaf J, Richardson D, Pizer B, Mallucci C. Skull base surgery for tumors in children: long-term clinical and functional outcome. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;11(5):496–503. - PubMed
    1. Massimi L, Rigante M, D'Angelo L. et al.Quality of postoperative course in children: endoscopic endonasal surgery versus sublabial microsurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153(4):843–849. - PubMed
    1. Banu M A, Guerrero-Maldonado A, McCrea H J. et al.Impact of skull base development on endonasal endoscopic surgical corridors. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;13(2):155–169. - PubMed
    1. Teo C, Dornhoffer J, Hanna E, Bower C. Application of skull base techniques to pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;15(2–3):103–109. - PubMed