Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Feb 4;4(1):29-39.
doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i1.29.

Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, and prevention of deep vein thrombosis recurrence and the post-thrombotic syndrome in the primary care medicine setting anno 2014

Affiliations
Review

Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, and prevention of deep vein thrombosis recurrence and the post-thrombotic syndrome in the primary care medicine setting anno 2014

Jan Jacques Michiels et al. World J Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

The requirement for a safe diagnostic strategy of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) should be based on an overall objective post incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of less than 1% during 3 mo follow-up. Compression ultrasonography (CUS) of the leg veins has a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%-98% indicating the need of repeated CUS testing within one week. A negative ELISA VIDAS safely excludes DVT and VTE with a NPV between 99% and 100% at a low clinical score of zero. The combination of low clinical score and a less sensitive D-dimer test (Simplify) is not sensitive enough to exclude DVT and VTE in routine daily practice. From prospective clinical research studies it may be concluded that complete recanalization within 3 mo and no reflux is associated with a low or no risk of PTS obviating the need of MECS 6 mo after DVT. Partial and complete recanalization after 3 to more than 6 mo is usually complicated by reflux due to valve destruction and symptomatic PTS. Reflux seems to be a main determinant for PTS and DVT recurrence, the latter as a main contributing factor in worsening PTS. This hypothesis is supported by the relation between the persistent residual vein thrombosis (RVT = partial recanalization) and the risk of VTE recurrence in prospective studies. Absence of RVT at 3 mo post-DVT and no reflux is predicted to be associated with no recurrence of DVT (1.2%) during follow-up obviating the need of wearing medical elastic stockings and anticoagulation at 6 mo post-DVT. The presence or absence of RVT but with reflux at 3 to 6 mo post-DVT is associated with both symptomatic PTS and an increased risk of VTE recurrence in about one third in the post-DVT period after regular discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment. To test this hypothesis we designed a prospective DVT and postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) Bridging the Gap Study by addressing at least four unanswered questions in the treatment of DVT and PTS. Which DVT patient has a clear indication for long-term compression stocking therapy to prevent PTS after the initial anticoagulant treatment in the acute phase of DVT? Is 3 mo the appropriate point in time to determine candidates at risk to develop DVT recurrence and PTS? Which high risk symptomatic PTS patients need extended anticoagulant treatment?

Keywords: Anticoagulation; Deep Venous thrombosis; ELISA VIDAS D-dimer; Medical elastic stockings; Post-thrombotic syndrome; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rotterdam approach to safely exclude and diagnose deep vein thrombosis[8,9]. CUS: Compression ultrasonography; DVT: Deep vein thrombosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Recanalization of proximal deep vein thrombosis is usually delayed and may be completed after 3, 6 to 9 mo post-deep vein thrombosis with a high incidence of reflux, deep vein thrombosis recurrence and PTS. A: The relationship between the time of complete recanalization after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (lysis time of leg vein thrombosis) appears to be 3 mo for those DVT patients who did not develop reflux, but appeared to be about 9 to 12 mo for those DVT patients who developed reflux as a main determinant for the development of PTS [Common femoral vein (CFV), superficial femoral vein (SFV), middle superficial femoral vein (SFM), distal superficial vein (SFD), popliteal vein (PPT), posterior tibial vein (PTV), greater saphena vein (GSV)][15]; B: Localization of reflux in patients with delayed recanalization (Figure 2A) of deep vein thrombosis[15].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Event free recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism in 78 “low risk” DVT patients with no residual vein thrombosis at 3 mo post-DVT (RVT Neg) as compared to 92 "high risk" DVT patients with RVT at 3 mo post-DVT (RVT Pos group) after discontinuation of anticoagulation during 2 years follow-up in the prospective study of Siragusa et al[18]. RVT: Residual vein thrombosis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Incidence of the post-thrombotic syndrome according to the CEAP classification in patients with deep vein thrombosis during long-term follow-up[32].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Rotterdam approach to the post-thrombotic syndrome according to Wentel et al[33]. PTS: Postthrombotic syndrome; MECS: Medical elastic compression stockings.
Figure 6
Figure 6
2007 Rotterdam Erasmus study design, time schedule, clinical score assessment and procedures for prospective evaluation of post-DVT venous thromboembolism-recurrence and postthrombotic syndrome. PTS: Postthrombotic syndrome; MECS: Medical elastic compression stockings.
Figure 7
Figure 7
European DVT - postthrombotic syndrome Bridging the Gap study design 2014. MECS: Medical elastic compression stockings.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Algorith modification of the D-dimer strategy according to the modified PROLONG study 23 for the duration and extension of anticoagulant treatment in post-DVT patients on top of objective risk stratification in Figure 7.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Freyburger G, Trillaud H, Labrouche S, Gauthier P, Javorschi S, Bernard P, Grenier N. D-dimer strategy in thrombosis exclusion--a gold standard study in 100 patients suspected of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: 8 DD methods compared. Thromb Haemost. 1998;79:32–37. - PubMed
    1. van der Graaf F, van den Borne H, van der Kolk M, de Wild PJ, Janssen GW, van Uum SH. Exclusion of deep venous thrombosis with D-dimer testing--comparison of 13 D-dimer methods in 99 outpatients suspected of deep venous thrombosis using venography as reference standard. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:191–198. - PubMed
    1. Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ, de Moerloose P, Lepage R, Slosman D, Didier D, Unger PF, Patenaud JV, Bounameax H. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet. 1999;353:190–195. - PubMed
    1. Oudega R, Moons KG, Hoes AW. Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care. A simple diagnostic algorithm including D-dimer testing. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94:200–205. - PubMed
    1. Oudega R, Hoes AW, Moons KG. The Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:100–107. - PubMed