Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Nuclear Medicine May Be Overestimated
- PMID: 25686785
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.008
Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Nuclear Medicine May Be Overestimated
Abstract
Although the International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection's definition of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) does not include nuclear imaging as part of the diagnostic criteria, many contemporary nuclear imaging studies are reporting exceptional results in PJI diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review of studies published from 2004 to 2012 reporting the accuracy of nuclear imaging for diagnosis of PJI, utilizing a specially designed tool (QUADAS-2) for critical appraisal and investigation of bias. Our results revealed high risk of bias as well as high levels of concern regarding the clinical applicability of these tests in a majority of the studies. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that the use of nuclear imaging for diagnosis of PJI be limited to a few select cases.
Keywords: bias; diagnostic imaging; nuclear imaging; periprosthetic joint infection; total joint arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Comment on: "Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Nuclear Medicine May Be Overestimated" by Claudio Diaz-Ledezma, Courtney Lamberton, Paul Lichtstein and Javad Parvizi.J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):551-2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 10. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 26253477 No abstract available.
-
In Reply.J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):552-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 10. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 26253483 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources