Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr 5;370(1665):20130551.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0551.

Climate, environmental and socio-economic change: weighing up the balance in vector-borne disease transmission

Affiliations
Review

Climate, environmental and socio-economic change: weighing up the balance in vector-borne disease transmission

Paul E Parham et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Arguably one of the most important effects of climate change is the potential impact on human health. While this is likely to take many forms, the implications for future transmission of vector-borne diseases (VBDs), given their ongoing contribution to global disease burden, are both extremely important and highly uncertain. In part, this is owing not only to data limitations and methodological challenges when integrating climate-driven VBD models and climate change projections, but also, perhaps most crucially, to the multitude of epidemiological, ecological and socio-economic factors that drive VBD transmission, and this complexity has generated considerable debate over the past 10-15 years. In this review, we seek to elucidate current knowledge around this topic, identify key themes and uncertainties, evaluate ongoing challenges and open research questions and, crucially, offer some solutions for the field. Although many of these challenges are ubiquitous across multiple VBDs, more specific issues also arise in different vector-pathogen systems.

Keywords: climate; climate change; human health; modelling; vector-borne diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the climate impacts and risk assessment framework (CIRF). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
System diagram showing the key requirements for understanding the risk of dengue virus transmission in humans across the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East (EMME) region (pink) and the linkages between drivers, hosts and potential indicators for monitoring. DHF, Dengue haemorrhagic fever. (Online version in colour.)

References

    1. Lafferty KD. 2009. The ecology of climate change and infectious diseases. Ecology 90, 888–900. (10.1890/08-0079.1) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rohr JR, Dobson AP, Johnson PT, Kilpatrick AM, Paull SH, Raffel TR, Ruiz-Moreno D, Thomas MB. 2011. Frontiers in climate change—disease research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 270–277. (10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.002) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sutherst RW. 2004. Global change and human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17, 136–173. (10.1128/CMR.17.1.136-173.2004) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tabachnick WJ. 2010. Challenges in predicting climate and environmental effects on vector-borne disease episystems in a changing world. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 946–954. (10.1242/jeb.037564) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodó X, et al. 2013. Climate change and infectious diseases: can we meet the needs for better prediction? Clim. Change 118, 625–640. (10.1007/s10584-013-0744-1) - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources