Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 May;26(5):987-991.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv037. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

Radiofrequency ablation is a valid treatment option for lung metastases: experience in 566 patients with 1037 metastases

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Radiofrequency ablation is a valid treatment option for lung metastases: experience in 566 patients with 1037 metastases

T de Baère et al. Ann Oncol. 2015 May.

Abstract

Background: Minimal invasive methods are needed as an alternative to surgery for treatment of lung metastases.

Patients and methods: The prospective database of two cancer centers including all consecutive patients treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for lung metastasis over 8 years was reviewed. RFA was carried out under general anesthesia, with computed tomography guidance using a 15-gauge multitined expandable electrodes RF needle.

Results: Five hundred sixty-six patients including 290 men (51%), 62.7 ± 13.2 years old with primary tumor to the colon (34%), rectum (18%), kidney (12%), soft tissue (9%) and miscellaneous (27%) received 642 RFA for 1037 lung metastases. Fifty-three percent of patients had 1 metastasis, 25% had 2, 14% had 3, 5% had 4 and 4% had 5-8. Metastases were unilateral (75%), or bilateral (25%). The median diameter [extremes] of metastases was 15 mm (4-70). Twenty-two percent of patients had extrapulmonary disease amenable to local therapy including 49 liver, 16 bone and 60 miscellaneous metastases. Median follow-up was 35.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 62 months. Four-year local efficacy was 89%. Four-year lung disease control rate was 44.1%, with patient retreated safely up to four times. Primary origin, disease-free interval, size and number of metastases were associated with OS in multivariate analysis. Progression at RFA site was associated with poor OS [P = 0.011, hazard ratio (HR): 1.69 (95% confidence interval 1.13-2.54)]. In the 293 colorectal cancer metastases, size >2 cm (HR = 2.10, P = 0.0027) and a number of metastases ≥3 (HR = 1.86, P = 0.011) remained significantly associated with OS. A prognostic score made of three groups based on the four above-mentioned prognostic factors demonstrated 3-year OS rates of respectively 82.2%, 69.5% and 53.6% (log-rank test, P ≤ 0.0001) among the three groups in the overall population, and of 81.3%, 72.8% and 57.9% (log-rank test, P = 0.005) in the colorectal cancer patients.

Conclusion: Radiofrequency is an option for treatment of small size lung metastases, namely the ones below 2-3 cm.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; lung metastases; radiofrequency ablation; thermal ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overall survival rate in the complete population according to 3-category OS prognostic score based on the 4 OS prognostic factors: primary disease other than colon or kidney, DFI less or equal to 1 year, size higher than 2 cm, more than two lung metastases. 1st category: no unfavorable factor. 3rd category: at least one of the disease factors (primary disease other than colon or kidney or DFI less or equal to 1 year) and one of the lung metastasis factors (size higher than 2 cm or more than two lung metastases). 2nd category: the others.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Lung progressions and locally untreatable lung progressions.

Comment in

References

    1. Ahmed M, Liu Z, Afzal KS, et al. Radiofrequency ablation: effect of surrounding tissue composition on coagulation necrosis in a canine tumor model. Radiology 2004; 230: 761–767. - PubMed
    1. Jaskolka JD, Kachura JR, Hwang DM, et al. Pathologic assessment of radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21: 1689–1696. - PubMed
    1. Dupuy DE, Zagoria RJ, Akerley W, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 57–59. - PubMed
    1. de Baere T, Palussiere J, Auperin A, et al. Mid-term local efficacy and survival after radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors with a minimum follow-up of 1 year: prospective evaluation. Radiology 2006; 240: 587–596. - PubMed
    1. Hess A, Palussiere J, Goyers JF, et al. Pulmonary radiofrequency ablation in patients with a single lung: feasibility, efficacy, and tolerance. Radiology 2011; 258: 635–642. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms