Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:614690.
doi: 10.1155/2015/614690. Epub 2015 Jan 19.

Elephant (Elephas maximus) Health and Management in Asia: Variations in Veterinary Perspectives

Affiliations

Elephant (Elephas maximus) Health and Management in Asia: Variations in Veterinary Perspectives

David Miller et al. Vet Med Int. 2015.

Abstract

There is a need to identify strategic investments in Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) health that will yield maximal benefits for overall elephant health and conservation. As an exploratory first step, a survey was administered to veterinarians from Asian elephant range countries at a workshop and via email to help prioritize health-related concerns that will mostly benefit elephants. Responses were received from 45 veterinarians from eight countries that had a range of experience with captive and wild elephants. The occurrence of medical conditions and responses to treatment varied among responses. However, injuries, parasitism, and gastrointestinal disease were reported as the most common syndromes responsible for elephant morbidity, whereas injury and infectious disease not due to parasitism were the most commonly reported sources of elephant mortality. Substandard nutrition, water quality and quantity deficiencies, and inadequate or absent shelter were among the factors listed as barriers to optimal elephant health. While this survey's results do not support definitive conclusions, they can be used to identify where and how subsequent investigations should be directed. Rigorous assessment of the relative costs and benefits of available options is required to ensure that investments in individual and population health yield the maximal benefits for elephants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wilson K. A., McBride M. F., Bode M., Possingham H. P. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature. 2006;440(7082):337–340. doi: 10.1038/nature04366. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halpern B. S., Pyke C. R., Fox H. E., Haney J. C., Schlaepfer M. A., Zaradic P. Gaps and mismatches between global conservation priorities and spending. Conservation Biology. 2006;20(1):56–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00258.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maciosek M. V., Coffield A. B., Edwards N. M., Flottemesch T. J., Solberg L. I. Prioritizing clinical preventive services: a review and framework with implications for community preventive services. Annual Review of Public Health. 2009;30:341–355. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100253. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanderson M. W., Gnad D. P. Biosecurity for reproductive diseases. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 2002;18(1):79–98. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00003-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) Appendices I, II and III. Geneva, Switzerland: Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora; 2013. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources