Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;5(4):1000203.
doi: 10.4172/2155-6180.1000203.

A Joint Modeling Approach for Right Censored High Dimensional Multivariate Longitudinal Data

Affiliations

A Joint Modeling Approach for Right Censored High Dimensional Multivariate Longitudinal Data

Miran A Jaffa et al. J Biom Biostat. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Analysis of multivariate longitudinal data becomes complicated when the outcomes are of high dimension and informative right censoring is prevailing. Here, we propose a likelihood based approach for high dimensional outcomes wherein we jointly model the censoring process along with the slopes of the multivariate outcomes in the same likelihood function. We utilized pseudo likelihood function to generate parameter estimates for the population slopes and Empirical Bayes estimates for the individual slopes. The proposed approach was applied to jointly model longitudinal measures of blood urea nitrogen, plasma creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate which are key markers of kidney function in a cohort of renal transplant patients followed from kidney transplant to kidney failure. Feasibility of the proposed joint model for high dimensional multivariate outcomes was successfully demonstrated and its performance was compared to that of a pairwise bivariate model. Our simulation study results suggested that there was a significant reduction in bias and mean squared errors associated with the joint model compared to the pairwise bivariate model.

Keywords: Informative right censoring; Joint modeling; Likelihood based approach; Multivariate longitudinal outcomes; Random effect; Slope estimation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a–b): BUN, eGFR (a), and Serum creatinine mean levels (b) respectively plotted against follow-up months.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a–b): BUN, eGFR (a), and Serum creatinine mean levels (b) respectively plotted against number of visits.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. James GD, Seally JE, Alderman M, Ljungman S, Mueller FB, Pecker MS, Laragh JH. A longitudinal study of urinary creatinine and creatinine clearance in normal subjects. Race, sex and age differences. Am J Hypertension. 1988:124–131. - PubMed
    1. Schrier RW. Blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine not married in heart failure. Circulation Heart Failure. 2008;1:25–33. - PubMed
    1. Cirillo M, Anastasio P, De Santo NG. Relationship of gender, age, and body mass index to errors in predicted kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:1791–1798. - PubMed
    1. Froissart M, Rossert J, Jacquot C, Paillard M, Houillier P. Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:763–773. - PubMed
    1. Verhave JC, Fesler P, Ribstein J, du Cailar G, Mimran A. Estimation of renal function in subjects with normal serum creatinine levels: influence of age and body mass index. Am J Kidney Diseases. 2005;46:233–241. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources