Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Feb 17;313(7):687-94.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.280.

Effect of varenicline on smoking cessation through smoking reduction: a randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of varenicline on smoking cessation through smoking reduction: a randomized clinical trial

Jon O Ebbert et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Some cigarette smokers may not be ready to quit immediately but may be willing to reduce cigarette consumption with the goal of quitting.

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of varenicline for increasing smoking abstinence rates through smoking reduction.

Design, setting, and participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational clinical trial with a 24-week treatment period and 28-week follow-up conducted between July 2011 and July 2013 at 61 centers in 10 countries. The 1510 participants were cigarette smokers who were not willing or able to quit smoking within the next month but willing to reduce smoking and make a quit attempt within the next 3 months. Participants were recruited through advertising.

Interventions: Twenty-four weeks of varenicline titrated to 1 mg twice daily or placebo with a reduction target of 50% or more in number of cigarettes smoked by 4 weeks, 75% or more by 8 weeks, and a quit attempt by 12 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary efficacy end point was carbon monoxide-confirmed self-reported abstinence during weeks 15 through 24. Secondary outcomes were carbon monoxide-confirmed self-reported abstinence for weeks 21 through 24 and weeks 21 through 52.

Results: The varenicline group (n = 760) had significantly higher continuous abstinence rates during weeks 15 through 24 vs the placebo group (n = 750) (32.1% for the varenicline group vs 6.9% for the placebo group; risk difference (RD), 25.2% [95% CI, 21.4%-29.0%]; relative risk (RR), 4.6 [95% CI, 3.5-6.1]). The varenicline group had significantly higher continuous abstinence rates vs the placebo group during weeks 21 through 24 (37.8% for the varenicline group vs 12.5% for the placebo group; RD, 25.2% [95% CI, 21.1%-29.4%]; RR, 3.0 [95% CI, 2.4-3.7]) and weeks 21 through 52 (27.0% for the varenicline group vs 9.9% for the placebo group; RD, 17.1% [95% CI, 13.3%-20.9%]; RR, 2.7 [95% CI, 2.1-3.5]). Serious adverse events occurred in 3.7% of the varenicline group and 2.2% of the placebo group (P = .07).

Conclusions and relevance: Among cigarette smokers not willing or able to quit within the next month but willing to reduce cigarette consumption and make a quit attempt at 3 months, use of varenicline for 24 weeks compared with placebo significantly increased smoking cessation rates at the end of treatment, and also at 1 year. Varenicline offers a treatment option for smokers whose needs are not addressed by clinical guidelines recommending abrupt smoking cessation.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01370356.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr. Ebbert reports grants from Pfizer, Orexigen and JHP Pharmaceuticals and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline during the conduct of the study. Dr. Hughes reports personal fees from Alere/Free and Clear, Equinox, GlaxoSmithKline, Healthwise, Pfizer, Embera, Selecta, DLA Piper, Dorrffermeyer, Nicoventures, Pro Ed, Publicis, Cicatelli, and non-financial support from Swedish Match, outside the submitted work. Dr. West reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Johnson & Johnson outside the submitted work. Dr. Rennard reports personal fees from Almirall, Novartis, Nycomed, Pfizer, A2B Bio, Dalichi Sankyo, APT Pharma/Britnall, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Decision Resource, Dunn Group, Easton Associates, Gerson, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Theravance, Almirall, CSL Behring, MedImmune, Novartis, Pearl, Takeda, Forest, CME Incite, Novis, PriMed, Takeda, grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Otsuka, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, and Johnson & Johnson, outside the submitted work. Dr. Russ, Dr. McRae, Ms. Treadow, Dr. Yu, Dr. Dutro, and Dr. Park are employees and stock holders of Pfizer Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT Diagram aParticipants not randomized to study treatment due to reasons classified by the investigators as “other” included reasons such as: did not attend randomization visit; unable to commit to attending study visits; change in work schedule; change in concomitant medications; change in personal circumstances; and unavailability of urine drug screening kits. bTreatment phase was weeks 1 through 24. Includes 9 varenicline participants and 7 placebo participants who withdrew from the study before receiving study medication counted under the respective category for reasons of withdrawal. Note that one placebo participant stayed in the study although did not take any study medication, also see d. Discontinuations from study due to reasons classified by the investigators as “other” included reasons such as: new job or change in work schedule; moved out of area; change in personal or family circumstances; and unwilling or unable to attend visits. cInsufficient clinical response was a prepopulated option chosen by the investigators on the case report forms. dIncludes 1 placebo participant who did not receive any study medication but completed the study. ePost-treatment follow-up phase was weeks 25 through 52. Discontinuations from study due to reasons classified by the investigators as “other” included reasons such as: new job or change in work schedule; moved out of area; change in personal or family circumstances; and unwilling or unable to attend visits.
Figure 2
Figure 2
7-Day Point Prevalence Smoking Abstinence and 95% Confidence Intervals Week 12 RD = 24.5%; 95% CI 20.8%, 28.3%; RR = 4.7; 95% CI 3.5, 6.2. Week 24 RD = 25.7%; 95% CI 21.2%, 30.1%; RR = 2.5; 95% CI 2.1, 3.0. Week 52 RD = 15.8%; 95% CI 11.5%, 20.2%); RR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.6, 2.2. Abbreviations: RD, risk difference; RR, relative risk; CIs, confidence intervals; N, all randomized participants.

Comment in

References

    1. Borland R, Partos TR, Yong HH, Cummings KM, Hyland A. How much unsuccessful quitting activity is going on among adult smokers? Data from the International Tobacco Control Four Country cohort survey. Addiction. 2012 Mar;107(3):673–682. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shiffman S, Hughes JR, Ferguson SG, Pillitteri JL, Gitchell JG, Burton SL. Smokers' interest in using nicotine replacement to aid smoking reduction. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Nov;9(11):1177–1182. - PubMed
    1. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. [Accessed December 31, 2014];Clinical Practice Guideline. 2008 http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/guidelines-recomm....
    1. Boyle P, Gandini S, Robertson C, et al. Characteristics of smokers’ attitudes towards stopping. Eur J Public Health. 2000;10(3 Supplement):5–14.
    1. Asfar T, Ebbert JO, Klesges RC, Relyea GE. Do smoking reduction interventions promote cessation in smokers not ready to quit? Addict Behav. 2011 Jul;36(7):764–768. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data