Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;27(2):159-64.
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000160.

Prenatal diagnosis and management of monoamniotic twins

Affiliations
Review

Prenatal diagnosis and management of monoamniotic twins

Keisuke Ishii. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this article is to investigate the perinatal outcomes of monoamniotic twins under current standards of prenatal management involving intensive fetal surveillance.

Recent findings: The incidence of perinatal mortality in monoamniotic twins has fallen over the last 2 decades. Umbilical cord entanglement has long been considered one of the main causes of poor outcome among monoamniotic twins; however, new evidence shows that it appears to be less important than prematurity and congenital anomalies. If intensive fetal surveillance is provided, the risk of perinatal mortality is acceptably low regardless of setting. In uncomplicated monoamniotic twin pregnancies, delivery at around 33 weeks of gestation might reduce the risk of neonatal adverse events without increasing the risk of perinatal death.

Summary: Perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twins improved if intensive fetal surveillance was performed under either outpatient or inpatient management. Planned delivery in uncomplicated monoamniotic twin pregnancies can be considered at around 33 weeks of gestation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by