Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;9(4):436-46.
doi: 10.1007/s12105-015-0615-3. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

A Subset of Sinonasal Non-Intestinal Type Adenocarcinomas are Truly Seromucinous Adenocarcinomas: A Morphologic and Immunophenotypic Assessment and Description of a Novel Pitfall

Affiliations

A Subset of Sinonasal Non-Intestinal Type Adenocarcinomas are Truly Seromucinous Adenocarcinomas: A Morphologic and Immunophenotypic Assessment and Description of a Novel Pitfall

Bibianna Purgina et al. Head Neck Pathol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

While sinonasal intestinal type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is defined by an intestinal phenotype, non-intestinal type adenocarcinoma (non-ITAC) is traditionally viewed as a diagnosis of exclusion, despite previous implication of a seromucinous phenotype and similarity to sinonasal seromucinous hamartomas (SSH). We performed a comparison of clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic features of ITAC, non-ITAC and SSH using traditional discriminatory markers and new markers of seromucinous differentiation. Twenty-three non-ITAC, 17 ITAC, and 5 SSH were retrieved (1987-2014). As expected, ITAC occurred predominantly in the nasal cavity in elderly patients (mean age 65 years) with a striking male predilection (15:2). Regardless of grade/subtype, all ITAC were invariably CK20 and CDX2 positive, and many (11/15) showed some CK7 positivity. Non-ITAC occurred in younger individuals (mean age 51 years) with a slight female predilection (male to female ratio: 10:13) and showed diverse morphologic patterns and grades, some with morphologic similarity to SSH. SSH occurred in younger individuals (mean age 33 years). Non-ITAC and SSH were invariably CK7 positive and CK20 negative, however, 4/22 non-ITAC and 2/5 SSH showed squamoid morular metaplasia that aberrantly expressed CDX2 and co-expressed nuclear β-catenin. Markers of seromucinous differentiation (S100, DOG1, and SOX10) were essentially absent in ITAC, but present to varying degrees in the majority of non-ITAC and all SSH. Thus, the term 'seromucinous adenocarcinoma' is the more appropriate designation for non-ITAC. Squamoid morules in non-ITAC and SSH may be an immunophenotypic pitfall given the aberrant CDX2 expression.

Keywords: Adenocarcinoma; DOG1; Non-intestinal; SOX10; Seromucinous.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Morphologic spectrum of ITAC. a PTCC-I showing a predominantly papillary growth pattern (H&E, ×40), and stratification of fairly monomorphic nuclei resembling the appearance of a colonic adenoma (inset H&E, ×200). b PTCC-II showing a tubular and cribriform growth with stromal reaction similar to colorectal carcinoma (H&E, ×40), and more cytonuclear atypia and apoptotic debris (inset H&E, ×200). c AGC showing predominantly mucin filled spaces akin to a mucinous adenocarcinoma of colon (H&E, ×40), tumor nests are found floating in the mucin filled spaces (inset H&E, ×200). d PTCC-III showing a solid growth pattern and cytologic atypia (H&E, ×100). e Recurrence of same case showing SRC pattern instead (H&E, ×100)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Morphologic spectrum of non-ITAC. a SSH-like (minimal deviation) non-ITAC showing a rounded tubulolobular growth similar to SSH, but with larger more confluent tumor nests (H&E, ×40). This tumor is low grade and composed of bland monomorphic tubules with almost no nuclear atypia (inset H&E, ×200). b Tubulopapillary non-ITAC showing columnar cells with nuclear stratification evident even at this magnification (H&E, ×40). This tumor is intermediate grade with nuclear membrane irregularities and prominent nucleoli with some mitotic activity (inset H&E, ×200). c Solid-cribriform non-ITAC with prominent central comedonecrosis (H&E, ×40). This tumor is high grade with prominent nuclear pleomorphism in addition to the necrosis (inset H&E, ×200). d Non-ITAC with tubulopapillary areas and intermediate nuclear grade (H&E, ×100). e The majority of this same case, however, showed solid ribbon like trabecular growth reported in ‘blastomatous’ tumors (H&E, ×100)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Variant morphologies in tubulopapillary non-ITAC. a Low grade tumor with micro and macrocystic change (H&E, ×100). b Low grade tumor with prominent psammoma-like calcifications (H&E, ×100). c Low grade tumor with lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in papillae resembling those of salivary Warthin tumor (H&E, ×100)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Morphologic features of SSH. a SSH tended to be small polypoid lesions (H&E, ×40) with a lobular proliferation of acini, mostly serous (inset H&E, ×200). b A larger SSH with respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma caliber glandular spaces (H&E, ×40)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Squamoid morular metaplasia. a Squamoid morular metaplasia in non-ITAC with central cystic change with foamy macrophages (H&E, ×200). b Less mature squamoid morule (arrow) in SSH. (H&E, ×200)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Immunophenotype of ITAC, non-ITAC, and SSH using classical markers. a ITAC (H&E, ×40 showing. b CK20 (×100). c CDX2 (×100) positivity. d focal CK7 positivity (×100). e Intermediate grade tubulopapillary non-ITAC (H&E, ×40) showing. f CK20 (×100), and g CDX2 (×100) negativity, and h CK7 positivity (×100). i SSH (H&E, ×40) similarly showing j CK20 (×100), and k CDX2 (×100) negativity, and l CK7 positivity (×100). However, a subset of non-ITAC and SSH showed m squamoid morular metaplasia (H&E, ×100) which showed n CDX2 positivity in the morules (×200). o This corresponded to areas of nuclear accumulation of β-catenin (×200)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Immunophenotype of SSH and non-ITAC using markers of seromucinous differentiation. a SSH (H&E, ×40) showing b S100 positivity in serous acini (×100), c DOG1 apical luminal staining mainly in serous acini (×100), and d SOX10 expression in all acini (×100). e Intermediate grade tubulopapillary non-ITAC (H&E, ×40) showing f focal S100 positivity (×100), g weak DOG1 apical luminal staining (×100), and h SOX10 positivity (×100)

References

    1. Turner JH, Reh DD. Incidence and survival in patients with sinonasal cancer: a historical analysis of population-based data. Head Neck. 2012;34(6):877–885. doi: 10.1002/hed.21830. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnes L. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Am J Surg Pathol. 1986;10(3):192–202. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198603000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kleinsasser O, Schroeder HG. The pathology and clinical picture of adenocarcinoma of the nose after wood dust exposure. Strahlenther Onkol. 1989;165(6):437–440. - PubMed
    1. Franquemont DW, Fechner RE, Mills SE. Histologic classification of sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15(4):368–375. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199104000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batsakis JG, Mackay B, Ordonez NG. Enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity. An electron microscopic and immunocytochemical study. Cancer. 1984;54(5):855–860. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840901)54:5<855::AID-CNCR2820540516>3.0.CO;2-3. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances