Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates
- PMID: 25691129
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub2
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates
Update in
-
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 12;5:CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub4. PMID: 29862490 Free PMC article. Updated.
Abstract
Background: Establishment of secure airway is a critical part of neonatal resuscitation both in the delivery room and in the neonatal unit. Videolaryngoscopy is a new technique that has the potential to facilitate successful endotracheal intubation and decrease adverse consequences of delay in airway stabilization. Videolaryngoscopy may enhance visualization of the glottis and intubation success in neonates.
Objectives: To determine the efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy in decreasing the time and attempts required and increasing the success rate for endotracheal intubation in neonates.
Search methods: We used the search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. We searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating videolaryngoscopy for neonatal endotracheal intubation in May 2013 in the electronic databases; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies; websites for registered trials at www.clinicaltrials.gov and www.controlled-trials.com; and in the reference lists of relevant studies.
Selection criteria: Randomized or quasi-randomized trials in neonates evaluating videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation compared with direct laryngoscopy.
Data collection and analysis: Review authors performed data collection and analysis as recommended by the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Two review authors (KL and MP) independently assessed studies identified by the search strategy for inclusion.
Main results: Our search strategy performed in May 2013 yielded 7057 references. Two review authors (MP and KL) independently assessed all references for inclusion. We did not find any completed studies for inclusion but identified three ongoing trials and one study awaiting classification.
Authors' conclusions: There was insufficient evidence to recommend or refute the use of videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in neonates. Well-designed, adequately powered randomized controlled studies are necessary to address efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in neonates.
Similar articles
-
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 12;5:CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub4. PMID: 29862490 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 24;5(5):CD011413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011413.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28539007 Free PMC article.
-
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4:CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3. PMID: 27844477 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 12;5(5):CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37171122 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35373840 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Videolaryngoscopy Bails us out of Difficult Intubation Scenarios in Syndromic Children: A Case Series.Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021 Feb;49(1):78-82. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2020.00947. Epub 2020 May 18. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021. PMID: 33718912 Free PMC article.
-
Video versus direct laryngoscopy to improve the success rate of nasotracheal intubations in the neonatal intensive care setting: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Jul;7(1):e001958. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-001958. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023. PMID: 37429668 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mind the gap: can videolaryngoscopy bridge the competency gap in neonatal endotracheal intubation among pediatric trainees? a randomized controlled study.J Perinatol. 2017 Aug;37(8):979-983. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.72. Epub 2017 May 18. J Perinatol. 2017. PMID: 28518132 Clinical Trial.
-
Scandinavian SSAI clinical practice guideline on pre-hospital airway management.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Aug;60(7):852-64. doi: 10.1111/aas.12746. Epub 2016 Jun 3. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016. PMID: 27255435 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pediatric Trainees Managing a Difficult Airway: Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway, Direct, and Video-Assisted Laryngoscopy.OTO Open. 2017 May 8;1(2):2473974X17707916. doi: 10.1177/2473974X17707916. eCollection 2017 Apr-Jun. OTO Open. 2017. PMID: 30480183 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical