A methodological comparison of two formulations of temazepam in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects
- PMID: 2569191
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1989.tb00595.x
A methodological comparison of two formulations of temazepam in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects
Abstract
In a double-blind and cross-over study 12 healthy subjects took temazepam 20 mg in two different formulations (soft gelatine capsule or uncoated tablet) and matched placebo at one-week intervals. Plasma temazepam concentrations at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 8, 12 and 24 hours after treatment were analyzed by gas chromatography. Psychomotor performance was measured objectively (digit symbol substitution, letter cancellation, Maddox wing test) and subjectively (visual analogue scales) before the drug intake and 1, 2 and 3 hours later and the plasma benzodiazepine concentrations were analyzed also by radioreceptor bioassay. The two different formulations were compared in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic terms, and the gas chromatographic and radioreceptor assays were compared. The soft gelatine capsule produced higher peak plasma concentrations than the uncoated tablet. The computed AUCs and elimination half-lives proved to be similar after either formulation. A satisfactory correlation between the bioassayed benzodiazepine concentrations and chemically assayed temazepam was shown. In pharmacodynamic terms the results suggest a shorter and somewhat smaller subjective response for the capsule than for the tablet form.
Similar articles
-
Acute pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of two different formulations of temazepam.Med Biol. 1985;63(1):21-7. Med Biol. 1985. PMID: 2860283 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of the soft gelatin capsule and the tablet form of temazepam.Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1986 Jan;58(1):49-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1986.tb00069.x. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1986. PMID: 2869638 Clinical Trial.
-
Objective and subjective assessment of hangover during subacute administration of temazepam and nitrazepam to healthy subjects.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;26(3):375-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00548770. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984. PMID: 6145593
-
Pharmacokinetics of a new sublingual formulation of temazepam.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;35(4):437-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00561380. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988. PMID: 2904371 Clinical Trial.
-
Bioavailability of temazepam in soft gelatin capsules.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;8(1):31S-35S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb00452.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979. PMID: 41540 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Subjective and behavioral effects of diazepam depend on its rate of onset.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993;112(2-3):324-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02244928. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993. PMID: 7871037 Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of temazepam and ethanol on human psychomotor performance.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;43(6):603-11. doi: 10.1007/BF02284958. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992. PMID: 1493841 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of microcomputer-based psychomotor tests for the evaluation of benzodiazepine effects on human performance: a review with emphasis on temazepam.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1992 Oct;34(4):289-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb05633.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1992. PMID: 1457261 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources