Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 18;10(2):e0116464.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116464. eCollection 2015.

"A cigarette a day keeps the goodies away": smokers show automatic approach tendencies for smoking--but not for food-related stimuli

Affiliations

"A cigarette a day keeps the goodies away": smokers show automatic approach tendencies for smoking--but not for food-related stimuli

Alla Machulska et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Smoking leads to the development of automatic tendencies that promote approach behavior toward smoking-related stimuli which in turn may maintain addictive behavior. The present study examined whether automatic approach tendencies toward smoking-related stimuli can be measured by using an adapted version of the Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT). Given that progression of addictive behavior has been associated with a decreased reactivity of the brain reward system for stimuli signaling natural rewards, we also used the AAT to measure approach behavior toward natural rewarding stimuli in smokers. During the AAT, 92 smokers and 51 non-smokers viewed smoking-related vs. non-smoking-related pictures and pictures of natural rewards (i.e. highly palatable food) vs. neutral pictures. They were instructed to ignore image content and to respond to picture orientation by either pulling or pushing a joystick. Within-group comparisons revealed that smokers showed an automatic approach bias exclusively for smoking-related pictures. Contrary to our expectations, there was no difference in smokers' and non-smokers' approach bias for nicotine-related stimuli, indicating that non-smokers also showed approach tendencies for this picture category. Yet, in contrast to non-smokers, smokers did not show an approach bias for food-related pictures. Moreover, self-reported smoking attitude could not predict approach-avoidance behavior toward nicotine-related pictures in smokers or non-smokers. Our findings indicate that the AAT is suited for measuring smoking-related approach tendencies in smokers. Furthermore, we provide evidence for a diminished approach tendency toward food-related stimuli in smokers, suggesting a decreased sensitivity to natural rewards in the course of nicotine addiction. Our results indicate that in contrast to similar studies conducted in alcohol, cannabis and heroin users, the AAT might only be partially suited for measuring smoking-related approach tendencies in smokers. Nevertheless, our findings are of special importance for current etiological models and smoking cessation programs aimed at modifying nicotine-related approach tendencies in the context of a nicotine addiction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic demonstration of the trials used in the AAT for nicotine-related pictures.
Pulling the joystick increases the picture size, while pushing the joystick decreases the picture size.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean AAT-bias scores for nicotine-related images, images of toothbrushes, food images and neutral images, in smokers and non-smokers.
A positive score indicates an approach tendency, a negative an avoidance tendency. Error bars correspond +/− 1 standard error. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

References

    1. Deutsch R, Strack F (2006) Duality models in social psychology: From dual processing to interacting systems. Psychol Inq 17: 166–172.
    1. Strack F, Deutsch R (2004) Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8: 220–247. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith ER, DeCoster J (2000) Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 4: 108–131.
    1. Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenburg E, Thush C, Engels RCME, Sher KJ, et al. (2007) Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: A review and a model. Pharmacol, Biochem Be 86: 263–283. 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.09.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waters AJ, Shiffmann S, Bradley BP, Mogg K (2003) Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers. Addiction 98: 1409–1417. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00465.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types