Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Apr;41(7):649-61.
doi: 10.1111/apt.13115. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

Randomised clinical trial: the 5-HT4 agonist revexepride in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease who have persistent symptoms despite PPI therapy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomised clinical trial: the 5-HT4 agonist revexepride in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease who have persistent symptoms despite PPI therapy

N J Shaheen et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: A substantial proportion of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have only a partial response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Prokinetic drugs may improve reflux symptoms by enhancing oesophageal motility and gastric emptying.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of revexepride, a novel prokinetic 5-hydroxytryptamine type 4 (5-HT4 ) receptor agonist, compared with placebo, in patients with GERD who have a partial response to PPIs.

Methods: A phase 2b, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted, in which patients were randomised to one of three revexepride treatment groups (0.1, 0.5 and 2.0 mg three times daily) or placebo (1:1:1:1 ratio). Daily e-diary data captured patients' symptoms over an 8-week treatment period. The primary efficacy outcome was the weekly percentage of regurgitation-free days in the second half of the study (weeks 5-8).

Results: In total, 480 patients were randomised and 477 received treatment (mean age 47.9 years; 61% women). The mean percentage of regurgitation-free days increased from baseline (range, 15.0-18.8%) to week 8 (62.3-70.5%) in all four study arms; however, there were no statistically significant differences in this change between placebo and the three treatment arms. No dose-dependent relationship in treatment effect was observed for any of the study endpoints. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was revexepride dose-dependent. Only one serious TEAE occurred and none resulted in death.

Conclusions: Revexepride was no more effective than placebo in controlling regurgitation in patients with GERD symptoms partially responsive to PPIs. Revexepride was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01472939.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. PPI, proton pump inhibitor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study analysis population. n, number of patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean (± standard deviation) change from baseline in percentage of (a) regurgitation‐free and (b) heartburn‐free days by visit and treatment group (full analysis set). Regurgitation: differences in change from baseline between placebo and the three revexepride treatment groups were not statistically significant. Heartburn: there was a statistically significant difference (< 0.05) between revexepride 0.5 mg and placebo only.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage (± SE) of patients with a reduction of 3 or more days with (a) regurgitation and (b) heartburn, by visit and by treatment group (full analysis set). Regurgitation: differences in change from baseline between placebo and the three revexepride treatment groups were not statistically significant. Heartburn: there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between revexepride 0.5 mg and placebo only.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. El‐Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, et al Update on the epidemiology of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2014; 63: 871–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kulig M, Leodolter A, Vieth M, et al Quality of life in relation to symptoms in patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease – an analysis based on the ProGERD initiative. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 767–76. - PubMed
    1. Vakil N, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S, Kahrilas P, et al The Montreal definition and classification of gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) – a global evidence‐based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1900–20. - PubMed
    1. Voutilainen M, Sipponen P, Mecklin JP, et al Gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence, clinical, endoscopic and histopathological findings in 1,128 consecutive patients referred for endoscopy due to dyspeptic and reflux symptoms. Digestion 2000; 61: 6–13. - PubMed
    1. Jaspersen D, Kulig M, Labenz J, et al Prevalence of extra‐oesophageal manifestations in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease: an analysis based on the ProGERD Study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 1515–20. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data