Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;150(1):209-17.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3303-9. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

Utility of (18)F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer

Affiliations

Utility of (18)F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer

Kenjiro Aogi et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Postoperative prognosis is better for hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer than for other phenotypes; however, there are no definitive predictive factors for relapse or survival. This study aimed to evaluate the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and clinicopathological characteristics as possible predictors of postoperative relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer patients. We evaluated 262 patients with Stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed as luminal type (luminal A, 166; luminal B, 96 patients) who underwent preoperative FDG-PET/CT between January 2006 and December 2011 at two institutions. The relationships among SUVmax and clinicopathological factors (age, clinical T/N stage, nuclear grade, lymph node metastasis and vascular invasion) were evaluated. A phantom study was performed to correct differences in PET/CT analysis between two institutions. The patients were divided according to the SUVmax cutoff on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for OS (≤6.0 group vs. >6.0 group, AUC = 0.742). Clinical T-factor and nuclear grade were significantly correlated with SUVmax (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0092, respectively). In the uni- and multivariate analyses using the Cox model for relapse, SUVmax was significant (p = 0.013 and p = 0.055, respectively) among characteristics. RFS curves showed that prognosis was significantly better for the SUVmax ≤ 6.0 group than for the SUVmax > 6.0 group (p = 0.004). Similarly, SUVmax was significant for OS (p = 0.007 and p = 0.008). OS was significantly different between the SUVmax ≤ 6.0 and >6.0 groups (p < 0.001). SUVmax was useful for predicting outcomes in patients with luminal-type breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) adjusted by analyzing an experimental phantom (revised SUVmax) at two institutions. After revision, the SUVmax ratio of the two institutions was close to 1.00
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of revised maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) for overall survival in luminal-type breast cancer (n = 262). The SUVmax cutoff value for overall survival was set to 6.0 after evaluating the ROC area under the curve (0.742 with 95 % CI 0.513–0.970)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relapse-free survival (RFS) curves for prognostic factors, considering the revised maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and nuclear grade. The RFS of the revised SUVmax ≤ 6.0 group was significantly better than that of the revised SUVmax > 6.0 group in the log-rank test (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in RFS between the nuclear grades (nuclear grades I/and II versus grade III) in the log-rank test (p = 0.120)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Overall survival (OS) curves for revised maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and nuclear grade. The OS of the revised SUVmax ≤ 6.0 group was significantly better than that of the revised SUVmax > 6.0 group in the log-rank test (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in OS among the nuclear grades in the log-rank test (p = 0.254)

References

    1. Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ, De Leyn PR, Verbeken EK, Deneffe GJ, et al. Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of 125 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3201–3206. - PubMed
    1. Okazumi S, Isono K, Enomoto K, Kikuchi T, Ozaki M, Yamamoto H, et al. Evaluation of liver tumors using fluorine—18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:339–344. - PubMed
    1. Fuster D, Duch J, Paredes P, Velasco M, Muñoz M, Santamaría G, et al. Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4746–4751. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1496. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Groheux D, Hindié E, Delord M, Giacchetti S, Hamy AS, de Bazelaire C, et al. Prognostic impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT findings in clinical stage III and IIB breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1879–1887. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs451. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Okada J, Yoshikawa K, Itami M, Imaseki K, Uno K, Itami J, et al. Positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in malignant lymphoma: a comparison with proliferative activity. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:325–329. - PubMed

MeSH terms