Risk factors for fatal outcome from rocky mountain spotted Fever in a highly endemic area-Arizona, 2002-2011
- PMID: 25697742
- PMCID: PMC4706357
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ116
Risk factors for fatal outcome from rocky mountain spotted Fever in a highly endemic area-Arizona, 2002-2011
Abstract
Background: Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is a disease that now causes significant morbidity and mortality on several American Indian reservations in Arizona. Although the disease is treatable, reported RMSF case fatality rates from this region are high (7%) compared to the rest of the nation (<1%), suggesting a need to identify clinical points for intervention.
Methods: The first 205 cases from this region were reviewed and fatal RMSF cases were compared to nonfatal cases to determine clinical risk factors for fatal outcome.
Results: Doxycycline was initiated significantly later in fatal cases (median, day 7) than nonfatal cases (median, day 3), although both groups of case patients presented for care early (median, day 2). Multiple factors increased the risk of doxycycline delay and fatal outcome, such as early symptoms of nausea and diarrhea, history of alcoholism or chronic lung disease, and abnormal laboratory results such as elevated liver aminotransferases. Rash, history of tick bite, thrombocytopenia, and hyponatremia were often absent at initial presentation.
Conclusions: Earlier treatment with doxycycline can decrease morbidity and mortality from RMSF in this region. Recognition of risk factors associated with doxycycline delay and fatal outcome, such as early gastrointestinal symptoms and a history of alcoholism or chronic lung disease, may be useful in guiding early treatment decisions. Healthcare providers should have a low threshold for initiating doxycycline whenever treating febrile or potentially septic patients from tribal lands in Arizona, even if an alternative diagnosis seems more likely and classic findings of RMSF are absent.
Keywords: American Indians; Rhipicephalus sanguineus; Rocky Mountain spotted fever; fatalities; tick-borne.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2015. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Comment on
-
Rocky mountain spotted fever characterization and comparison to similar illnesses in a highly endemic area-Arizona, 2002-2011.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 1;60(11):1650-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ115. Epub 2015 Feb 19. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25697743 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ormsbee RA. A review: “Studies in Pyroplasmosis hominis (‘spotted fever’ or ‘tick fever’ of the Rocky Mountains)” by Louis B. Wilson and William M. Chowning, published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases 1:31–57, 1904. Rev Infect Dis. 1979;1:559–62. - PubMed
-
- Chapman AS, Bakken JS, Folk SM, et al. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States: a practical guide for physicians and other health-care and public health professionals. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-4):1–27. - PubMed
-
- Pickering LK, Kimberlin DW, Long SS, Baker CJ. Red Book 2012 report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 29th. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012.
-
- Holman RC, Paddock CD, Curns AT, Krebs JW, McQuiston JH, Childs JE. Analysis of risk factors for fatal Rocky Mountain spotted fever: evidence for superiority of tetracyclines for therapy. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:1437–44. - PubMed
-
- Hattwick MA, Retailliau H, O’Brien RJ, Slutzker M, Fontaine RE, Hanson B. Fatal Rocky Mountain spotted fever. JAMA. 1978;240:1499–503. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
