Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling With Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Heart Failure in the BLOCK HF Trial
- PMID: 25697851
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001626
Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling With Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Heart Failure in the BLOCK HF Trial
Abstract
Background: Biventricular pacing in heart failure (HF) improves survival, relieves symptoms, and attenuates left ventricular (LV) remodeling. However, little is known about biventricular pacing in HF patients with atrioventricular block because they are typically excluded from biventricular trials.
Methods and results: The Biventricular versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients with Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF) trial randomized patients with atrioventricular block, New York Heart Association symptom classes I to III HF, and LV ejection fraction ≤50% to biventricular or right ventricular pacing. Doppler echocardiograms were obtained at randomization (after 30 to 60 days of right ventricular pacing postimplant) and every 6 months through 24 months. Data analysis comparing changes in 10 prespecified echo parameters over time was conducted using a Bayesian design. LV end systolic volume index was also evaluated as a predictor of mortality/morbidity. Of 691 randomized subjects, 624 had paired Doppler echocardiogram data for ≥1 analyses at 6, 12, 18, or 24 months. Biventricular pacing significantly reduced LV volume indices and intraventricular mechanical delay, and improved LV ejection fraction, consistent with LV reverse remodeling. These parameters showed little change with right ventricular pacing alone, indicating no systematic reverse remodeling with right ventricular pacing. LV end systolic volume index was predictive of mortality/morbidity; the estimated risk increased up to 1% for every 1 mL/m(2) increase in LV end systolic volume index.
Conclusions: LV end systolic volume index is a significant predictor of mortality/morbidity in this population. Cardiac structure and function are improved with biventricular pacing for patients with atrioventricular block and LV systolic dysfunction.
Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00267098.
Keywords: cardiac resynchronization therapy; echocardiography; heart failure, systolic; ventricular remodeling.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves left ventricular remodeling and function compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block.Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Nov;23(6):919-926. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9722-z. Heart Fail Rev. 2018. PMID: 29968221 Review.
-
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction.N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 25;368(17):1585-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210356. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23614585 Clinical Trial.
-
Revisiting diastolic filling time as mechanistic insight for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.Europace. 2013 Dec;15(12):1747-56. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut130. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Europace. 2013. PMID: 23821473
-
Left ventricular versus simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and a QRS complex ≥120 milliseconds.Circulation. 2011 Dec 20;124(25):2874-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032904. Epub 2011 Nov 21. Circulation. 2011. PMID: 22104549 Clinical Trial.
-
Should all patients with heart block receive biventricular pacing? All heart block patients with a pacemaker indication should receive biventricular pacing: one move, double the gains?Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;8(3):722-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.000626. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015. PMID: 26082528 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
The therapeutic effects of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy or chronic right ventricular pacing patients: a meta-analysis.Heart Fail Rev. 2022 Mar;27(2):507-516. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10091-z. Epub 2021 Feb 27. Heart Fail Rev. 2022. PMID: 33638772 Review.
-
Right Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure and Atrioventricular Block.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2016 Oct;13(5):230-236. doi: 10.1007/s11897-016-0299-3. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2016. PMID: 27553893 Review.
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves left ventricular remodeling and function compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block.Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Nov;23(6):919-926. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9722-z. Heart Fail Rev. 2018. PMID: 29968221 Review.
-
The Role for Cardiovascular Remodeling in Cardiovascular Outcomes.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 May;19(5):23. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0656-z. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017. PMID: 28357714 Review.
-
Risk factors of pacing dependence and cardiac dysfunction in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation.ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2325-2335. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13918. Epub 2022 Apr 26. ESC Heart Fail. 2022. PMID: 35474306 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous