Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 20;2015(2):CD007979.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007979.pub3.

Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals

Affiliations

Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals

Clare Goyder et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Email is one of the most widely used methods of communication, but its use in healthcare is still uncommon. Where email communication has been utilised in health care, its purposes have included clinical communication between healthcare professionals, but the effects of using email in this way are not well known. We updated a 2012 review of the use of email for two-way clinical communication between healthcare professionals.

Objectives: To assess the effects of email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals on healthcare professional outcomes, patient outcomes, health service performance, and service efficiency and acceptability, when compared to other forms of communicating clinical information.

Search methods: We searched: the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 9 2013), MEDLINE (OvidSP) (1946 to August 2013), EMBASE (OvidSP) (1974 to August 2013), PsycINFO (1967 to August 2013), CINAHL (EbscoHOST) (1982 to August 2013), and ERIC (CSA) (1965 to January 2010). We searched grey literature: theses/dissertation repositories, trials registers and Google Scholar (searched November 2013). We used additional search methods: examining reference lists and contacting authors.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series studies examining interventions in which healthcare professionals used email for communicating clinical information in the form of: 1) unsecured email, 2) secure email, or 3) web messaging. All healthcare professionals, patients and caregivers in all settings were considered.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, assessed the included studies' risk of bias, and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information and have reported all measures as per the study report.

Main results: The previous version of this review included one randomised controlled trial involving 327 patients and 159 healthcare providers at baseline. It compared an email to physicians containing patient-specific osteoporosis risk information and guidelines for evaluation and treatment versus usual care (no email). This study was at high risk of bias for the allocation concealment and blinding domains. The email reminder changed health professional actions significantly, with professionals more likely to provide guideline-recommended osteoporosis treatment (bone density measurement or osteoporosis medication, or both) when compared with usual care. The evidence for its impact on patient behaviours or actions was inconclusive. One measure found that the electronic medical reminder message impacted patient behaviour positively (patients had a higher calcium intake), and two found no difference between the two groups. The study did not assess health service outcomes or harms.No new studies were identified for this update.

Authors' conclusions: Only one study was identified for inclusion, providing insufficient evidence for guiding clinical practice in regard to the use of email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals. Future research should aim to utilise high-quality study designs that use the most recent developments in information technology, with consideration of the complexity of email as an intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Email reminder compared to usual care ‐ Primary outcome: professional actions or performance, Outcome 1 Patient received bone mineral density measurement.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Email reminder compared to usual care ‐ Primary outcome: professional actions or performance, Outcome 2 Patient received BMD measurement or medication.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Email reminder compared to usual care ‐ Primary outcome: professional actions or performance, Outcome 3 Patient received medication only.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Email reminder compared to usual care ‐ Primary outcome: professional actions or performance, Outcome 4 Patient received neither BMD measurement nor medication.

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Feldstein 2006 {published data only}
    1. Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Herson M, Orwoll E, Chen C, et al. Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2006;54(3):450‐7. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Atlas 2011 {published data only}
    1. Atlas SJ, Grant RW, Lester WT, Ashburner JM, Chang Y, Barry MJ, et al. A cluster‐randomized trial of a primary care informatics‐based system for breast cancer screening. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2011;26(2):154‐61. - PMC - PubMed
Chen 2010 {published data only}
    1. Chen Y, Brennan N, Magrabi F. Is email an effective method for hospital discharge communication? A randomized controlled trial to examine delivery of computer‐generated discharge summaries by email, fax, post and patient hand delivery. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2010;79(3):167‐72. - PubMed
Cline 2007 {published data only}
    1. Cline D, Ayala C, Caskie D, Ferrario C. Patient specific feedback increases referral of hypertensive emergency department patients: a randomized controlled trial. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting. Academic Emergency Medicine 2007;14(7):S117.
Dalal 2012 {published data only}
    1. Dalal AK, Schnipper JL, Poon EG, Williams DH, Rossi‐Roh K, Macleay A, et al. Design and implementation of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2012;19(4):523‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Edward 2007 {published data only}
    1. Edward C, Himmelmann A, Wallerstedt SM. Influence of an e‐mail with a drug information attachment on sales of prescribed drugs: a randomized controlled study. BMC Clinical Pharmacology 2007;7:7‐12. - PMC - PubMed
Feldman 2005 {published data only}
    1. Feldman PH, Murtaugh CM, Pezzin LE, McDonald MV, Peng TR. Just‐in‐time evidence‐based e‐mail "reminders" in home health care: impact on patient outcomes. Health Services Research 2005;40(3):865‐85. - PMC - PubMed
Jaatinen 2002 {published data only}
    1. Jaatinen PT, Aarnio P, Remes J, Hannukainen J, Köymäri ST. Teleconsultation as a replacement for referral to an outpatient clinic. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2002;8(2):102‐6. - PubMed
Johansson 2009 {published data only}
    1. Johansson M‐L, Brunlof G, Edward C, Wallerstedt SM. Effects of e‐mails containing ADR information and a current case report on ADR reporting rate and quality of reports. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2009;65(5):511‐4. - PubMed
Kerfoot 2010 {published data only}
    1. Kerfoot BP, Lawler EV, Sokolovskaya G, Gagnon D, Conlin PR. Durable improvements in prostate cancer screening from online spaced education a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2010;39(5):472‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Lester 2004 {published data only}
    1. Lester WT, Grant R, Barnett GO, Chueh H. Facilitated lipid management using interactive e‐mail: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2004;107(Pt 1):232‐6. - PubMed
Lester 2006 {published data only}
    1. Lester WT, Grant RW, Barnett GO, Chueh HC. Randomized controlled trial of an informatics‐based intervention to increase statin prescription for secondary prevention of coronary disease. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2006;21(1):22‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Lobach 2013 {published data only}
    1. Lobach D, Kawamoto K, Anstrom K, Silvey G, Willis J, Johnson F, et al. A randomized trial of population‐based clinical decision support to manage health and resource use for Medicaid beneficiaries. Journal of Medical Systems 2013;37(1):1‐10. - PubMed
Mandall 2005 {published data only}
    1. Mandall NA, O'Brien KD, Brady J, Worthington HV, Harvey L. Teledentistry for screening new patient orthodontic referrals. Part 1: A randomized controlled trial. British Dental Journal 2005;199(10):659‐62. - PubMed
McKee 2011 {published data only}
    1. McKee M, Fletcher J, Sigal I, Giftos J, Schechter, Walker EA. A collaborative approach to control hypertension in diabetes: outcomes of a pilot intervention. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 2011;2(3):148. - PMC - PubMed
Murtaugh 2005 {published data only}
    1. Murtaugh CM, Pezzin LE, McDonald MV, Feldman PH, Peng TR. Just in‐time evidence based e‐mail "reminders" in home health care: impact on nurse practices. Health Services Research 2005;40(3):849‐64. - PMC - PubMed
Persell 2008 {published data only}
    1. Persell SD, Denecke‐Dattalo TA, Dunham DP, Baker DW. Patient‐directed intervention versus clinician reminders alone to improve aspirin use in diabetes: a cluster randomized trial. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety / Joint Commission Resources 2008;34(2):98‐105. - PubMed
Quan 2013 {published data only}
    1. Quan SD, Wu RC, Rossos PG, Arany T, Groe S, Morra D, et al. It's not about pager replacement: an in‐depth look at the interprofessional nature of communication in healthcare. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8(3):137‐43. - PubMed
Schopf 2012 {published data only}
    1. Schopf T, Flytkjaer V. Impact of interactive web‐based education with mobile and email‐based support of general practitioners on treatment and referral patterns of patients with atopic dermatitis: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(6):e171. - PMC - PubMed
Ward 2008 {published data only}
    1. Ward LD, Spain CV, Perilla MJ, Morales KH, Linkin DR. Improving disease reporting by clinicians: the effect of an internet‐based intervention. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 2008;14(1):56‐61. - PubMed

Additional references

Abujudeh 2009
    1. Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, Choy G, Whelton DG, Rosenthal DI. Important imaging finding e‐mail alert system: experience after 3 years of implementation. Radiology 2009;252(3):747‐53. - PubMed
Atherton 2009a
    1. Atherton H, Car J, Meyer B. Email for the provision of information on disease prevention and health promotion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007982] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Atherton 2009b
    1. Atherton H, Car J, Meyer B. Email for clinical communication between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007978] - DOI
Atherton 2012
    1. Atherton H, Sawmynaden P, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Car J. Email for clinical communication between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007978.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Bitter 2000
    1. Bitter J. E‐mail in medical practice: legal and ethical concerns. QRC Advisor 2000;16(3):1‐8. - PubMed
Brooks 2006
    1. Brooks RG, Menachemi N. Physicians' use of email with patients: factors influencing electronic communication and adherence to best practices. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2006;8(1):e2. - PMC - PubMed
Car 2004a
    1. Car J, Sheikh A. Email consultations in health care: 1. scope and effectiveness. BMJ 2004;329(7463):435‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Car 2004b
    1. Car J, Sheikh A. Email consultations in health care: 2. acceptability and safe application. BMJ 2004;329(7463):439‐42. - PMC - PubMed
Car 2008
    1. Car J, Black A, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Pagliari C, McKinstry B, et al. The impact of EHealth on the quality and safety of healthcare. Available from https://www1.imperial.ac.uk/resources/32956FFC‐BD76‐47B7‐94D2‐FFAC56979B74/ (Accessed 22/01/2015). - PMC - PubMed
CBI 2006
    1. Confederation of British Industry (CBI). Google survey of internet trends for business and consumers. Available from http://www.brightonbusiness.co.uk/secure/assets/ni20061126.875299_45698d... (Accessed 22/01/2015).
Chan 2011
    1. Chan RJ, Webster J, Marquart L. Information interventions for orienting patients and their carers to cancer care facilities. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008273.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Couchman 2001
    1. Couchman GR, Forjuoh MD, Samuel N. E‐mail communications in family practice: what do patients expect?. Journal of Family Practice 2001;50(5):414‐18. - PubMed
Couchman 2005
    1. Couchman GR, Forjuoh SN, Rascoe TG, Reis MD, Koehler B, Walsum KL. E‐mail communications in primary care: what are patients' expectations for specific test results?. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2005;74(1):21‐30. - PubMed
Craig 2008
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. - PMC - PubMed
Dhillon 2010
    1. Dhillon J, Shaw NJ. You've got mail: consultant email practice. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2010;95(9):765. - PubMed
Freed 2003
    1. Freed DH. Patient‐physician e‐mail: passion or fashion?. Health Care Manager 2003;22(3):265‐74. - PubMed
Gaster 2003
    1. Gaster B, Knight CL, DeWitt DE, Sheffield JV, Assefi NP, Buchwald D. Physicians' use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2003;18(5):385‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Gordon 2003
    1. Gordon C, Krimholtz M. E‐mail and patients: a medicolegal minefield. Lancet 2003;362(9397):1768. - PubMed
Harris 2001
    1. Harris Interactive. New data show internet, website and email usage by physicians all increasing. Health Care News 2001; Vol. 1, issue 8:1‐3.
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org (Accessed 22/01/2015)..
Hobbs 2003
    1. Hobbs J, Wald J, Jagannath YS, Kittler A, Pizziferri L, Volk LA, et al. Opportunities to enhance patient and physician e‐mail contact. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003;70(1):1‐9. - PubMed
Houston 2003
    1. Houston TK, Sands DZ, Nash BR, Ford DE. Experiences of physicians who frequently use e‐mail with patients. Health Communication 2003;15(4):515‐25. - PubMed
IWS 2007
    1. Internet World Statistics (IWS). World internet usage and population statistics. Available from www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm (Accessed 22/01/2015).
Kassirer 2000
    1. Kassirer JP. Patients, physicians, and the Internet. Health Affairs 2000;19(6):115‐23. - PubMed
Katz 2004
    1. Katz SJ, Moyer CA. The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2004;19(9):978‐83. - PMC - PubMed
Katzen 2005
    1. Katzen C, Solan MJ, Dicker AP. E‐mail and oncology: a survey of radiation oncology patients and their attitudes to a new generation of health communication. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Disease 2005;8(2):189‐93. - PubMed
Kleiner 2002
    1. Kleiner KD, Akers R, Burke BL, Werner EJ. Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communication in pediatric practices. Pediatrics 2002;109(5):740‐4. - PubMed
Lee 2003
    1. Lee S, Broderick TJ, Haynes J, Bagwell C, Doarn CR, Merrell RC. The role of low‐bandwidth telemedicine in surgical prescreening. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2003;38(9):1281‐3. - PubMed
Leong 2005
    1. Leong SL, Gingrich D, Lewis PR, Mauger DT, George JH. Enhancing doctor‐patient communication using email: a pilot study. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2005;18(3):180‐88. - PubMed
Liederman 2003
    1. Liederman EM, Morefield CS. Web messaging: a new tool for patient‐physician communication. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003;10(3):260‐70. - PMC - PubMed
Liederman 2005
    1. Liederman EM, Lee JC, Baquero VH, Seites PG. The impact of patient‐physician web messaging on provider productivity. The Journal of Healthcare Information Management 2005;19(2):81‐6. - PubMed
Lomas 2008
    1. Lomas E. Inbox health check. He@lth Information on the Internet 2008;66(1):3‐5.
Moyer 1999
    1. Moyer CA, Stern DT, Katz SJ, Fendrick AM. "We got mail": electronic communication between physicians and patients. American Journal of Managed Care 1999;5(12):1513‐22. - PubMed
Moyer 2002
    1. Moyer CA, Stern DT, Dobias KS, Cox DT, Katz SJ. Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e‐mail communication in primary care. American Journal of Managed Care 2002;8(5):427‐33. - PubMed
Neville 2004
    1. Neville RG, Marsden W, McCowan C, Pagliari C, Mullen H, Fannin A. Email consultations in general practice. Informatics in Primary Care 2004;12(4):207‐14. - PubMed
NHS Connecting for Health 2011
    1. NHS Connecting for Health. Electronic Prescription Service (EPS). Available from http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/eps (Accessed 22/01/2015).
Patterson 2007
    1. Patterson V, Swinfen P, Swinfen R, Azzo E, Taha H, Wootton R. Supporting hospital doctors in the Middle East by email telemedicine: something the industrialized world can do to help. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2007;9(4):e30. - PMC - PubMed
Pew 2005
    1. Pew Internet. The Pew Internet & American life project. Generations online in 2009. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/2009/01/28/generations‐online‐in‐2009/ (Accessed 22/01/2015).
Podichetty 2004
    1. Podichetty V, Penn D. The progressive roles of electronic medicine: benefits, concerns, and costs. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 2004;328(2):94‐9. - PubMed
Ryan 2013
    1. Ryan R, Hill S, Broclain D, Horey D, Oliver S, Prictor M, Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. Study Quality Guide. Available from http://cccrg.cochrane.org/sites/cccrg.cochrane.org/files/uploads/StudyQu... (Accessed 22/01/2015).
Sawmynaden 2012
    1. Sawmynaden P, Atherton H, Majeed A, Car J. Email for the provision of information on disease prevention and health promotion. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2012;14(11):CD007982. doi: 10.1002/14651858. - PMC - PubMed
Schünemann 2011
    1. Schünemann JH, Oxman AD, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and ‘Summary of findings’ tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook forSystematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The CochraneCollaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Stiles 2007
    1. Stiles RA, Deppen SA, Figaro MK, Gregg WM, Jirjis JN, Rothman RL, et al. Behind‐the‐scenes of patient‐centered care: content analysis of electronic messaging among primary care clinic providers and staff. Medical Care 2007;45(12):1205‐9. - PubMed
Stutchfield 2007
    1. Stutchfield BM, Jagilly R, Tulloh BR. Second opinions in remote surgical practice using email and digital photography. ANZ Journal of Surgery 2007;77(11):1009‐12. - PubMed
TechWeb Network 2008
    1. TechWeb Network 2008. TechWeb Encylopedia. Available from http://www.techweb.com/encyclopedia (Accessed 22/01/2015).
Thede 2007
    1. Thede LQ. Networking via e‐mail. Computers, Information and Nursing 2007;25(5):251‐3. - PubMed
Virji 2006
    1. Virji A, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Scannell MA, Gradison M, et al. Use of email in a family practice setting: opportunities and challenges in patient‐ and physician‐initiated communication. BMC Medicine 2006;4:18. [DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-18] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Voss 1992
    1. Voss S. How much do doctors know about the notification of infectious diseases?. BMJ 1992;304(6829):755. - PMC - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Atherton 2009
    1. Atherton H, Car J, Meyer B, Majeed A. Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007979] - DOI - PubMed
Pappas 2012
    1. Pappas Y, Atherton H, Sawmynaden P, Car J. Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007979.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types