Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Feb 5:9:2.
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00002. eCollection 2015.

Functions of delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and mnemonic scotomas revisited

Affiliations
Review

Functions of delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and mnemonic scotomas revisited

Shintaro Funahashi. Front Syst Neurosci. .

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is one of key concepts to understand functions of the prefrontal cortex. Delay-period activity is an important neural correlate to understand the role of WM in prefrontal functions. The importance of delay-period activity is that this activity can encode not only visuospatial information but also a variety of information including non-spatial visual features, auditory and tactile stimuli, task rules, expected reward, and numerical quantity. This activity also participates in a variety of information processing including sensory-to-motor information transformation. These mnemonic features of delay-period activity enable to perform various important operations that the prefrontal cortex participates in, such as executive controls, and therefore, support the notion that WM is an important function to understand prefrontal functions. On the other hand, although experiments using manual versions of the delayed-response task had revealed many important findings, an oculomotor version of this task enabled us to use multiple cue positions, exclude postural orientation during the delay period, and further prove the importance of mnemonic functions of the prefrontal cortex. In addition, monkeys with unilateral lesions exhibited specific impairment only in the performance of memory-guided saccades directed toward visual cues in the visual field contralateral to the lesioned hemisphere. This result indicates that memories for visuospatial coordinates in each hemifield are processed primarily in the contralateral prefrontal cortex. This result further strengthened the idea of mnemonic functions of the prefrontal cortex. Thus, the mnemonic functions of the prefrontal cortex and delay-period activity may not need to be reconsidered, but should be emphasized.

Keywords: delay-period activity; delayed-response task; mnemonic scotoma; prefrontal cortex; spatial-information processing; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Schematic drawings of the events in the oculomotor delayed-response (ODR) task. (B) Drawing of the Wisconsin general test apparatus (WGTA). (C) Schematic drawings of a monkey performing the delayed-response task in the WGTA. Reproduced from Goldman-Rakic (1987).
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of directional delay-period activity observed in the prefrontal cortex. The visual cue was presented randomly at one of predetermined 8 peripheral positions. The position of each figure corresponds to the position of the visual cue. Significant activation was observed during the delay period only when the visual cue was presented at the 270° position. C: cue period (0.5 s). D: delay period (3.0 s). R: response period. Reproduced from Funahashi et al. (1989).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of focal lesions of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on performance in the ODR task. In this monkey (Monkey JN), the first lesion was located in the left principal sulcal region and, several months later, a second lesion was applied in the right principal sulcal region. The locations of the ellipses indicate the locations where the visual cues were presented. The size of the ellipse indicates the magnitude of the behavioral deficit. Three delay lengths (1.5 s, 3.0 s, and 6.0 s) were randomly applied. Note that larger deficits were observed when the visual cues were presented in the contralateral visual field with respect to the lesioned hemisphere. Reproduced from Funahashi et al. (1993a).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amemori K., Sawaguchi T. (2006). Rule-dependent shifting of sensorimotor representation in the primate prefrontal cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23, 1895–1909. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04702.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersen R. A., Essick G. K., Siegel R. M. (1985). Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science 230, 456–458. 10.1126/science.4048942 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersen R. A., Mountcastle V. B. (1983). The influence of the angle of gaze upon the excitability of the light-sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 3, 532–548. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen R. A., Snyder L. H., Bradley D. C., Xing J. (1997). Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 303–330. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apicella P., Scarnati E., Ljungberg T., Schultz W. (1992). Neuronal activity in monkey striatum related to the expectation of predictable environmental events. J. Neurophysiol. 68, 945–960. - PubMed