Socio-contextual Determinants of Research Evidence Use in Public-Youth Systems of Care
- PMID: 25702145
- DOI: 10.1007/s10488-015-0640-2
Socio-contextual Determinants of Research Evidence Use in Public-Youth Systems of Care
Abstract
Recent efforts have been devoted to understanding the conditions by which research evidence use (REU) is facilitated from the perspective of system leaders in the context of implementing evidence-based child mental health interventions. However, we have limited understanding of the extent to which outer contextual factors influence REU. Outer contextual factors for 37 counties in California were gathered from public records in 2008; and child welfare, juvenile justice, and mental health system leaders' perceptions of their REU were measured via a web-based survey from 2010 to 2012. Results showed that leaders with higher educational attainment and in counties with lower expenditures on inpatient mental health services were significantly associated with higher REU. Positive relationships between gathering research evidence and racial minority concentration and poverty at the county level were also detected. Results underscore the need to identify the organizational and socio-political factors by which mental health services and resources meet client demands that influence REU, and to recruit and retain providers with a graduate degree to negotiate work demands and interpret research evidence.
Keywords: Child welfare; Contextual determinants; Dissemination and implementation; Evidence-based practice; Mental health; System leaders.
Similar articles
-
Inter-organizational collaboration in the implementation of evidence-based practices among public agencies serving abused and neglected youth.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Jan;41(1):74-85. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0437-5. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014. PMID: 22886317 Clinical Trial.
-
The Humble Leader: Association of Discrepancies in Leader and Follower Ratings of Implementation Leadership With Organizational Climate in Mental Health.Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Feb 1;68(2):115-122. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600062. Epub 2016 Oct 3. Psychiatr Serv. 2017. PMID: 27691380 Free PMC article.
-
Organizational structure, climate, and collaboration between juvenile justice and community mental health centers: implications for evidence-based practice implementation for adolescent substance use disorder treatment.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):929. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05777-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 33032587 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of culturally diverse children and adolescents with depression.J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;22(1):72-9. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0051. Epub 2012 Jan 17. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2012. PMID: 22251021 Review.
-
Toward Creating Synergy Among Policy, Procedures, and Implementation of Evidence-Based Models in Child Welfare Systems: Two Case Examples.Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;20(1):78-86. doi: 10.1007/s10567-017-0226-5. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2017. PMID: 28236157 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review.Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 15;15(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3. Implement Sci. 2020. PMID: 33059748 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with program effectiveness in the implementation of a sexual risk reduction intervention for female sex workers across Mexico: Results from a randomized trial.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):e0201954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201954. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30204761 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical