Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;18(15):2759-69.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000087. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

Feasibility of an experiential community garden and nutrition programme for youth living in public housing

Affiliations

Feasibility of an experiential community garden and nutrition programme for youth living in public housing

Karissa Grier et al. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Few published community garden studies have focused on low socio-economic youth living in public housing or used a community-based participatory research approach in conjunction with youth-focused community garden programmes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility (i.e. demand, acceptability, implementation and limited-effectiveness testing) of a 10-week experiential theory-based gardening and nutrition education programme targeting youth living in public housing.

Design: In this mixed-methods feasibility study, demand and acceptability were measured using a combination of pre- and post-programme surveys and interviews. Implementation was measured via field notes and attendance. Limited-effectiveness was measured quantitatively using a pre-post design and repeated-measures ANOVA tests.

Setting: Two public housing sites in the Dan River Region of south central Virginia, USA.

Subjects: Forty-three youth (primarily African American), twenty-five parents and two site leaders.

Results: The positive demand and acceptability findings indicate the high potential of the programme to be used and be suitable for the youth, parents and site leaders. Field notes revealed numerous implementation facilitators and barriers. Youth weekly attendance averaged 4·6 of 10 sessions. Significant improvements (P<0·05) were found for some (e.g. fruit and vegetable asking self-efficacy, overall gardening knowledge, knowledge of MyPlate recommendations), but not all limited-effectiveness measures (e.g. willingness to try fruits and vegetables, fruit and vegetable eating self-efficacy).

Conclusions: This community-based participatory research study demonstrates numerous factors that supported and threatened the feasibility of a gardening and nutrition programme targeting youth in public housing. Lessons learned are being used to adapt and strengthen the programme for future efforts targeting fruit and vegetable behaviours.

Keywords: Community-based participatory research; Feasibility studies; Gardening; Health status disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Van Duyn MA & Pivonka E (2000) Overview of the health benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption for the dietetics professional: selected literature. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 1511–1521. - PubMed
    1. Kimmons J, Gillespie C, Seymour J et al.. (2009) Fruit and vegetable intake among adolescents and adults in the United States: percentage meeting individualized recommendations. Medscape J Med 11, 26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanson MD & Chen E (2007) Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: a review of the literature. J Behav Med 30, 263–285. - PubMed
    1. American Community Garden Association (n.d.) Growing Community Across the U.S. and Canada. https://communitygarden.org/mission/ (accessed February 2013).
    1. Davis JN, Ventura EE, Cook LT et al.. (2011) LA Sprouts: a gardening, nutrition, and cooking intervention for Latino youth improves diet and reduces obesity. J Am Diet Assoc 111, 1224–1230. - PubMed

Publication types