Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep;18(13):2358-67.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000221. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

Sustenance and sustainability: maximizing the impact of school gardens on health outcomes

Affiliations
Review

Sustenance and sustainability: maximizing the impact of school gardens on health outcomes

Jaimie N Davis et al. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: School garden programmes have become popular action-oriented learning environments in many countries, often driven by converging priorities of environmental sustainability and healthful diets. Many of these programmes have assessed the impact on dietary intake, specifically fruit and vegetable intake, and related dietary behaviours, such as knowledge, preference, motivation, intention and self-efficacy to eat and prepare fruit and vegetables. The objective of the present study was twofold: (i) to review published garden-based programmes conducted in schools targeting dietary intake and/or determinants of dietary behaviour in children; and (ii) to identify similar strategies and components employed by these garden-based programmes.

Design: The review included thirteen studies that have examined the impact of garden-based programmes conducted in school, either during school hours or in after-school settings, on dietary behaviours in children (kindergarten through 8th grade students).

Results: Three of the reviewed studies did not have a comparison or control group and simply evaluated within-group changes after a garden intervention. None of the reviewed studies were randomized, but were assigned based on school's interest and timing of new school gardens being built. Out of the eleven programmes that examined dietary intake, six found that the programme resulted in increased vegetable intake, whereas four showed no effect. Seven of the eight studies that measured preference found that the programmes resulted in increased preference for vegetables. Gardening programmes also resulted in improved attitudes towards, willingness to taste, identification of and self-efficacy to prepare/cook fruit and vegetables. Similar strategies/components employed by the majority of the programmes included: 'hands on' curriculum, incorporation of a cooking component, providing the instructors, parental and stakeholder support, food provision and using the garden as the focal point for media promotion.

Conclusions: Some of the garden programmes resulted in increased vegetable intake, which has positive implications for both environment sustainability and health-related outcomes. Further, the majority resulted in some improvement in behaviour determinants more generally. However, more research is warranted to understand how to achieve long-term improvements in dietary behaviours and how to sustain the garden-based programmes in schools.

Keywords: Fruit intake; School gardens; Sustainability; Vegetable intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual model of the impact of school garden programmes (adapted from Ozer( 11 ))

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhutta ZA, Salam RA & Das JK (2013) Meeting the challenges of micronutrient malnutrition in the developing world. Br Med Bull 106, 7–17. - PubMed
    1. Davis JN, Ventura EE, Cook LA et al.. (2011) LA Sprouts: a gardening, nutrition and cooking intervention for Latino youth improves diets and attenuate weight gain. J Am Diet Assoc 111, 1224–1230. - PubMed
    1. Somerset S & Bossard A (2009) Variations in prevalence and conduct of school food gardens in tropical and subtropical regions of North-Eastern Australia. Public Health Nutr 12, 1485–1493. - PubMed
    1. Christian MS, Evans CE, Hancock N et al.. (2013) Family meals can help children reach their 5 a day: a cross-sectional survey of children’s dietary intake from London primary schools. J Epidemiol Community Health 67, 332–338. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong D (2000) A survey of community gardens in upstate New York: implications for health promotion and community development. Health Place 6, 319–327. - PubMed