Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Aug 15:1:22.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2014.00022. eCollection 2014.

Biofilm Disrupting Technology for Orthopedic Implants: What's on the Horizon?

Affiliations
Review

Biofilm Disrupting Technology for Orthopedic Implants: What's on the Horizon?

Alexander Connaughton et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

The use of orthopedic implants in joints has revolutionized the treatment of patients with many debilitating chronic musculoskeletal diseases such as osteoarthritis. However, the introduction of foreign material into the human body predisposes the body to infection. The treatment of these infections has become very complicated since the orthopedic implants serve as a surface for multiple species of bacteria to grow at a time into a resistant biofilm layer. This biofilm layer serves as a protectant for the bacterial colonies on the implant making them more resistant and difficult to eradicate when using standard antibiotic treatment. In some cases, the use of antibiotics alone has even made the bacteria more resistant to treatment. Thus, there has been surge in the creation of non-antibiotic anti-biofilm agents to help disrupt the biofilms on the orthopedic implants to help eliminate the infections. In this study, we discuss infections of orthopedic implants in the shoulder then we review the main categories of anti-biofilm agents that have been used for the treatment of infections on orthopedic implants. Then, we introduce some of the newer biofilm disrupting technology that has been studied in the past few years that may advance the treatment options for orthopedic implants in the future.

Keywords: biofilms; infectious disease medicine; joint replacements; novel technology; orthopedics; periprosthetic fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Donlan RM. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis (2002) 8(9):881–90.10.3201/eid0809.020063 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renner LD, Weibel DB. Physicochemical regulation of biofilm formation. MRS Bull (2011) 36(5):347–55.10.1557/mrs.2011.65 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ribeiro M, Monteiro FJ, Ferraz MP. Infection of orthopedic implants with emphasis on bacterial adhesion process and techniques used in studying bacterial-material interactions. Biomatter (2012) 2(4):176–94.10.4161/biom.22905 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zoubos AB, Galanakos SP, Soucacos PN. Orthopedics and biofilm – what do we know? A review. Med Sci Monit (2012) 18(6):RA89–96.10.12659/MSM.882893 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, Steckelberg JM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS, et al. Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis (1998) 27(5):1247–54.10.1086/514991 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources