Validity and Reliability of the 6-Minute Step Test in Healthy Individuals: A Cross-sectional Study
- PMID: 25706661
- DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000190
Validity and Reliability of the 6-Minute Step Test in Healthy Individuals: A Cross-sectional Study
Abstract
Objective: To determine the 6-minute step test's (6MST) reliability and validity and to establish reference performance values of this test.
Design: Prospective observational cross-sectional study.
Setting: Spirometry and Respiratory Physiotherapy Laboratory, Federal University of São Carlos (institutional).
Participants: Ninety-one individuals [42 men and 49 women, mean age = 39 years (SD, 17 years)] without any diagnosed diseases and with normal exercise capacity [6-minute walk test (6MWT) >75% of the predicted normal].
Independent variables: Participants underwent two 6MST on 1 day and two 6MWT on another day in randomized order. Furthermore, age, gender, height, weight, lower limbs length, abdominal circumference, percentage of body fat, and fat-free mass were obtained.
Main outcome measures: Test-retest reliability was assessed by comparing the findings of the two 6MST using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot. Validity was assessed by comparing outcomes of the 6MST to outcomes of 6MWT using the Pearson correlation coefficient. A multiple regression analysis was conducted using the stepwise method to develop an equation to predict reference values.
Results: The performance (mean steps ± SD) in the first and second test was 149 ± 34 and 149 ± 36 steps, respectively, which was correlated to distance (in meters) in 6MWT (r = 0.72; P < 0.05). Six-minute step test performance was reliable (ICC = 0.9; 95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.93). The equation to predict reference values for the first 6MST was significant (P < 0.001 and R = 0.48): Performance(steps) = 174 to 1.05 × Age(years) to women and Performance(steps) = 209 to 1.05 × Age(years) to men.
Conclusions: Six-minute step test is a reliable and valid test. Moreover, the number of steps may be predicted by demographic and anthropometric variables with moderate strength of prediction.
Clinical relevance: Six-minute step test is an exercise test that is easy to be conducted, more tolerable than a graded exercise test, requires fewer equipments and space, and permits better monitoring of the participants. The assessment of the reliability, validity, and reference values will provide a better interpretability for clinicians to use it, especially in primary care.
Similar articles
-
Can we use the 6-minute step test instead of the 6-minute walking test? An observational study.Physiotherapy. 2017 Mar;103(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 14. Physiotherapy. 2017. PMID: 27012823
-
Influence of step length on 6-minute walk test performance in patients with chronic heart failure.Physiotherapy. 2012 Dec;98(4):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Oct 21. Physiotherapy. 2012. PMID: 23122439
-
Reliability and Validity of the 6-Minute Step Test for Clinical Assessment of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in People at Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.J Strength Cond Res. 2020 May;34(5):1376-1382. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002537. J Strength Cond Res. 2020. PMID: 29621116
-
Validity of Submaximal Step Tests to Estimate Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Adults.Sports Med. 2016 May;46(5):737-50. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0445-1. Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 26670455 Review.
-
Six-minute walk test: a valuable tool for assessing pulmonary impairment.J Bras Pneumol. 2011 Jan-Feb;37(1):110-7. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132011000100016. J Bras Pneumol. 2011. PMID: 21390439 Review. English, Portuguese.
Cited by
-
Author's Reply to Sabour and Ghassemi "Submaximal Step Tests to Estimate Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Adults: Methodological Issues About Validity and Reliability".Sports Med. 2016 Sep;46(9):1383-4. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0603-0. Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 27459865 No abstract available.
-
Efficacy of an asynchronous telerehabilitation program in post-COVID-19 patients: A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0270766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270766. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35853037 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic gait evoking in healthy adults through Vojta's peripheric somatosensory stimulation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Oct 1;21(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01470-2. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 39354570 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Adapted Chester Step Test Can Have Maximal Response Characteristics for the Assessment of Exercise Capacity in Young Women.Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 10;9(3):308. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030308. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33802097 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of Cardiorespiratory Fitness by the Six-Minute Step Test and Its Association with Muscle Strength and Power in Sedentary Obese and Lean Young Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145960. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26717568 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical