Efficacy of Super Slick elastomeric modules in reducing friction during sliding: a comparative in vitro study
- PMID: 25707823
- DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1576
Efficacy of Super Slick elastomeric modules in reducing friction during sliding: a comparative in vitro study
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate and compare the frictional resistance produced by Super Slick modules during sliding with four different types of brackets and four ligature types both in conventional and figure-of-8 ligation method with saliva as lubricant.
Materials and methods: The frictional resistance was evaluated by using four different ligatures on 0.019" × 0.025" stainless steel (SS) archwires using four different brackets using an universal testing machine with unstimulated saliva as a lubricant. Mean and SD values were calculated. Data was statistically analyzed using analysis of variance ANOVA with post hoc test.
Results: The results showed that self-ligating brackets produced least frictional forces. Among all other tested combinations,Tefon-coated SS ligatures in ceramic with metal slot brackets produced least coefficient of static and kinetic friction and full ceramic brackets ligated with Super Slick elastomeric modules demonstrated the highest, with other combinations falling in between.
Conclusion: Super Slick elastomeric modules, produced highest coefficient of both static and kinetic friction with the conventional and figure-of-8 ligation technique even in wet conditions using natural fresh human saliva.
Clinical significance: Both static and kinetic frictional resistance play an important role during sliding mechanics. Various factors have been attributed for friction. However, bracket type, archwire material, type of ligature and method of ligation are important variables. Recently polymeric coated slick elastomeric modules were introduced with the claim that they produce very low frictional forces in wet condition. Contrary to the claim made by the manufacturers of Super Slick elastomeric modules, they produced highest coefficient of both static and kinetic friction with the conventional and figure-of-8 ligation technique.
Similar articles
-
Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):670-5; quiz 754. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.025. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005. PMID: 15953891
-
The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Apr;123(4):416-22. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.14. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003. PMID: 12695769
-
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1015. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011. PMID: 22186750
-
Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials.Semin Orthod. 1997 Sep;3(3):166-77. doi: 10.1016/s1073-8746(97)80067-9. Semin Orthod. 1997. PMID: 9573878 Review.
-
Friction in orthodontics.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S334-8. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163439. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015. PMID: 26538873 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study.Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 3;15(7):2640. doi: 10.3390/ma15072640. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35407973 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of a Lubricating Gel (Orthospeed®) on Pain and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Orthodontic Patients during Initial Therapy with Conventional and Low-Friction Brackets: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.J Clin Med. 2020 May 14;9(5):1474. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051474. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32423007 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources