Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates
- PMID: 25708756
- PMCID: PMC4339796
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.032
Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates
Abstract
Background: Inadequate bowel cleansing is associated with missed lesions, yet whether polyp and adenoma detection rates (PDR, ADR) increase at the highest levels of bowel cleanliness is unknown.
Objective: To evaluate the association between bowel preparation quality by using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and PDR and ADR among colonoscopies with adequate preparation.
Design: Cross-sectional analysis.
Setting: Boston Medical Center (BMC) and the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (CORI).
Patients: Average-risk ambulatory patients attending screening colonoscopy with adequate bowel preparation defined as BBPS score ≥6.
Interventions: Colonoscopy.
Main outcome measurements: PDR and ADR stratified by BBPS score.
Results: Among the 3713 colonoscopies at BMC performed by 19 endoscopists, the PDR, ADR, and advanced ADR were 49.8%, 37.7%, and 6.0%, respectively. Among the 5532 colonoscopies in CORI performed by 85 endoscopists at 41 different sites, the PDR was 44.5%, and the PDR for polyps >9 mm (surrogate for advanced ADR) was 6.2%. The PDR associated with total BBPS scores of 6, 7, and 8 were higher than those associated with a BBPS score of 9 at BMC (BBPS 6, 51%; BBPS 7, 53%; BBPS 8, 52% vs BBPS 9, 46%; P = .002) and CORI (BBPS 6, 51%; BBPS 7, 48%; BBPS 8, 45% vs BBPS 9, 40%; P < .0001). This trend persisted after we adjusted for age, sex, and race and/or ethnicity and was observed for ADR and advanced ADR. PDR was higher among good compared with excellent preparations at BMC (odds ratio [OR] 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.5) and CORI (OR 4.7; 95% CI, 3.1-7.1).
Limitations: Retrospective study.
Conclusion: The PDR and ADR decreased at the highest levels of bowel cleanliness. Endoscopists finding a pristine bowel preparation should avoid a sense of overconfidence for polyp detection during the inspection phase of screening colonoscopy and still perform a careful evaluation for polyps. Furthermore, endoscopists expending additional effort to maximize cleansing of the bowel should never sacrifice on their inspection technique or inspection time.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Response.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):583-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.042. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 26279354 No abstract available.
-
Factors affecting bowel preparation and adenoma detection: patient or the doctor.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):583. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.015. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 26279355 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Longer Withdrawal Time Is More Important than Excellent Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy of Adequate Bowel Preparation.Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Apr;66(4):1168-1174. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06321-3. Epub 2020 May 18. Dig Dis Sci. 2021. PMID: 32419115
-
Multi-step validation of a deep learning-based system for the quantification of bowel preparation: a prospective, observational study.Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Nov;3(11):e697-e706. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00109-6. Epub 2021 Sep 16. Lancet Digit Health. 2021. PMID: 34538736
-
The effect of quality of segmental bowel preparation on adenoma detection rate.BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1019-8. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31286888 Free PMC article.
-
Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1121-1133. doi: 10.1111/den.14299. Epub 2022 Apr 6. Dig Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35294782 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;25(2):183-97. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Jan 9. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015. PMID: 25839681 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation Between Bowel Preparation and the Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy.Ann Coloproctol. 2017 Jun;33(3):93-98. doi: 10.3393/ac.2017.33.3.93. Epub 2017 Jun 30. Ann Coloproctol. 2017. PMID: 28761869 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive factors for adenoma detection rates: a video study of endoscopist practices.Endosc Int Open. 2021 Feb;9(2):E216-E223. doi: 10.1055/a-1321-0990. Epub 2021 Feb 3. Endosc Int Open. 2021. PMID: 33553584 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Sending Educational Video Clips via Smartphone Mobile Messenger on Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy.Clin Endosc. 2019 Jan;52(1):53-58. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.072. Epub 2018 Aug 29. Clin Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30153724 Free PMC article.
-
Response to JS Li et al.J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun;59(6):528-529. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02108-9. Epub 2024 Apr 27. J Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38671285 No abstract available.
-
Correlation between prescribing doctor attributes and intestinal cleanliness in colonoscopy: a study of 22522 patients.Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2262496. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2262496. Epub 2023 Sep 26. Ann Med. 2023. PMID: 37751492 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):378–384. - PubMed
-
- Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):76–79. - PubMed
-
- Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;97(7):1696–1700. - PubMed
-
- Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, Early DS, Wang JS. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1197–1203. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials