Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;81(3):691-699.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.032.

Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates

Audrey H Calderwood  1 , Katherine D Thompson  2 , Paul C Schroy 3rd  1 , David A Lieberman  3 , Brian C Jacobson  1
Affiliations

Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates

Audrey H Calderwood et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Inadequate bowel cleansing is associated with missed lesions, yet whether polyp and adenoma detection rates (PDR, ADR) increase at the highest levels of bowel cleanliness is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the association between bowel preparation quality by using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and PDR and ADR among colonoscopies with adequate preparation.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis.

Setting: Boston Medical Center (BMC) and the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (CORI).

Patients: Average-risk ambulatory patients attending screening colonoscopy with adequate bowel preparation defined as BBPS score ≥6.

Interventions: Colonoscopy.

Main outcome measurements: PDR and ADR stratified by BBPS score.

Results: Among the 3713 colonoscopies at BMC performed by 19 endoscopists, the PDR, ADR, and advanced ADR were 49.8%, 37.7%, and 6.0%, respectively. Among the 5532 colonoscopies in CORI performed by 85 endoscopists at 41 different sites, the PDR was 44.5%, and the PDR for polyps >9 mm (surrogate for advanced ADR) was 6.2%. The PDR associated with total BBPS scores of 6, 7, and 8 were higher than those associated with a BBPS score of 9 at BMC (BBPS 6, 51%; BBPS 7, 53%; BBPS 8, 52% vs BBPS 9, 46%; P = .002) and CORI (BBPS 6, 51%; BBPS 7, 48%; BBPS 8, 45% vs BBPS 9, 40%; P < .0001). This trend persisted after we adjusted for age, sex, and race and/or ethnicity and was observed for ADR and advanced ADR. PDR was higher among good compared with excellent preparations at BMC (odds ratio [OR] 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.5) and CORI (OR 4.7; 95% CI, 3.1-7.1).

Limitations: Retrospective study.

Conclusion: The PDR and ADR decreased at the highest levels of bowel cleanliness. Endoscopists finding a pristine bowel preparation should avoid a sense of overconfidence for polyp detection during the inspection phase of screening colonoscopy and still perform a careful evaluation for polyps. Furthermore, endoscopists expending additional effort to maximize cleansing of the bowel should never sacrifice on their inspection technique or inspection time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Response.
    Calderwood AH, Thompson KD, Schroy PC 3rd, Lieberman DA, Jacobson BC. Calderwood AH, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):583-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.042. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 26279354 No abstract available.
  • Factors affecting bowel preparation and adenoma detection: patient or the doctor.
    Jain D, Singhal S. Jain D, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):583. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.015. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 26279355 No abstract available.

References

    1. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):378–384. - PubMed
    1. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):76–79. - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;97(7):1696–1700. - PubMed
    1. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, Early DS, Wang JS. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1197–1203. - PubMed
    1. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1207–1214. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types