A Comparison of Canal-centering ability of Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems with Nickel Hand Instrumentation with Stainless Steel Hand Instrumentation in 10 to 25° Curved Canals using Kuttler's Cube
- PMID: 25709293
- PMCID: PMC4335104
- DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1256
A Comparison of Canal-centering ability of Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems with Nickel Hand Instrumentation with Stainless Steel Hand Instrumentation in 10 to 25° Curved Canals using Kuttler's Cube
Abstract
Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare the canal centering abilities of rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) files (ProFile 0.04 and 0.06 and Lightspeed LSX) and NiTi hand K-files in 10° to 25° curved canals. This was compared with the canal centering ability of stainless steel hand K-files using Kuttler's endodontic cube.
Settings and design: The teeth with a 10° to 25° of clinical mesiodistal curvature were used for this study. Each tooth was immersed in methylene blue dye for a period of 10 seconds, as recommended by Kuttler.
Materials and methods: The study sample comprised of 60 intact freshly extracted single rooted human mandibular premolars. The radiographs were traced on a tracing paper and the canal curvature was determined according to methodology introduced by Schneider.
Statistical analysis used: The statistical package SPSS PC + (Statistical package for social service, Version 4.01) was used for analysis.
Results: Overall, Lightspeed LSX instruments showed superior canal centering ability and performed better than Profile series, hand NiTi K-files and hand stainless steel K-files.
Conclusion: The endodontic cube can be used as an effective method for analyzing the canal-centering ability of different endodontic instruments. Both the NiTi rotary instruments showed superior canal-centering ability than NiTi and stainless steel hand K-files. How to cite this article: Swarnkar A. A Comparison of Canal-centering ability of Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems with Nickel Hand Instrumentation with Stainless Steel Hand Instrumentation in 10 to 25° Curved Canals using Kuttler's Cube. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(3):157-162.
Keywords: Canal-centering ability; Kuttler's endodontic case; Lightspeed (LSX).; NiTi rotary instruments; Profile.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures







References
-
- Park H. A comparison of greater taper files, ProFiles and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91:715–718. - PubMed
-
- Cimis GM, Boyer TJ, Pelleu GB. Effect of three file types on the apical preparation moderately curved canals. J Endod. 1988;14:441–444. - PubMed
-
- Yoshimine Y, Ono M, Akamine A. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-Shaped canals. J Endod. 2005;31:373–375. - PubMed
-
- Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borger RP. A methodology for the evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endodont. 1987;14:273–277. - PubMed
-
- Kuttler S, Garala Mand, Dorn RPSO. The endodontic cube: a system designed for evaluation of root canal anatomy and canal preparation. J Endodont. 2001;27:533–536. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources